Which process contains the Business, Service and Component sub-processes?
A. Capacity Management
B. Incident Management
C. Service Level Management
D. Financial Management
One Comment on “Which process contains the Business, Service and Component sub-processes?”
Michael McNeilsays:
4.3.4.1 Business Capacity Management
This sub-process translates business needs and plans into
requirements for service and IT infrastructure, ensuring
that the future business requirements for IT services are
quantified, designed, planned and implemented in a
timely fashion. This can be achieved by using the existing
data on the current resource utilization by the various
services and resources to trend, forecast, model or predict
future requirements. These future requirements come from
the Service Strategy and Service Portfolio detailing new
processes and service requirements, changes,
improvements, and also the growth in the existing
services
4.3.4.2 Service Capacity Management
The focus of this sub-process is the management, control
and prediction of the end-to-end performance and
capacity of the live, operational IT services usage and
workloads. It ensures that the performance of all services,
as detailed in service targets within SLAs and SLRs, is
monitored and measured, and that the collected data is
recorded, analysed and reported. Wherever necessary,
proactive and reactive action should be instigated, to
ensure that the performance of all services meets their
agreed business targets. This is performed by staff with
knowledge of all the areas of technology used in the
delivery of end-to-end service, and often involves
seeking advice from the specialists involved in
Component Capacity Management. Wherever possible,
automated thresholds should be used to manage all
operational services, to ensure that situations where
service targets are breached or threatened are rapidly
identified and cost-effective actions to reduce or avoid
their potential impact implemented.
4.3.4.3 Component Capacity Management
The focus in this sub-process is the management, control
and prediction of the performance, utilization and capacity
of individual IT technology components. It ensures that all
components within the IT infrastructure that have finite
resource are monitored and measured, and that the
collected data is recorded, analysed and reported. Again,
wherever possible, automated thresholds should be
implemented to manage all components, to ensure that
situations where service targets are breached or
threatened by component usage or performance are
rapidly identified, and cost-effective actions to reduce or
avoid their potential impact are implemented.
There are many similar activities that are performed by
each of the above sub-processes, but each sub-process
has a very different focus. Business Capacity Management
is focused on the current and future business
requirements, while Service Capacity Management is
focused on the delivery of the existing services that
support the business, and Component Capacity
Management is focused on the IT infrastructure that
underpins service provision. The role that each of these
sub-processes plays in the overall process and the use of
management tools is illustrated in Figure 4.9.
4.3.4.1 Business Capacity Management
This sub-process translates business needs and plans into
requirements for service and IT infrastructure, ensuring
that the future business requirements for IT services are
quantified, designed, planned and implemented in a
timely fashion. This can be achieved by using the existing
data on the current resource utilization by the various
services and resources to trend, forecast, model or predict
future requirements. These future requirements come from
the Service Strategy and Service Portfolio detailing new
processes and service requirements, changes,
improvements, and also the growth in the existing
services
4.3.4.2 Service Capacity Management
The focus of this sub-process is the management, control
and prediction of the end-to-end performance and
capacity of the live, operational IT services usage and
workloads. It ensures that the performance of all services,
as detailed in service targets within SLAs and SLRs, is
monitored and measured, and that the collected data is
recorded, analysed and reported. Wherever necessary,
proactive and reactive action should be instigated, to
ensure that the performance of all services meets their
agreed business targets. This is performed by staff with
knowledge of all the areas of technology used in the
delivery of end-to-end service, and often involves
seeking advice from the specialists involved in
Component Capacity Management. Wherever possible,
automated thresholds should be used to manage all
operational services, to ensure that situations where
service targets are breached or threatened are rapidly
identified and cost-effective actions to reduce or avoid
their potential impact implemented.
4.3.4.3 Component Capacity Management
The focus in this sub-process is the management, control
and prediction of the performance, utilization and capacity
of individual IT technology components. It ensures that all
components within the IT infrastructure that have finite
resource are monitored and measured, and that the
collected data is recorded, analysed and reported. Again,
wherever possible, automated thresholds should be
implemented to manage all components, to ensure that
situations where service targets are breached or
threatened by component usage or performance are
rapidly identified, and cost-effective actions to reduce or
avoid their potential impact are implemented.
There are many similar activities that are performed by
each of the above sub-processes, but each sub-process
has a very different focus. Business Capacity Management
is focused on the current and future business
requirements, while Service Capacity Management is
focused on the delivery of the existing services that
support the business, and Component Capacity
Management is focused on the IT infrastructure that
underpins service provision. The role that each of these
sub-processes plays in the overall process and the use of
management tools is illustrated in Figure 4.9.