To add value to the business, what are the four reasons to monitor and measure?
A. Validate; Direct; Justify; Improve
B. Evaluate; Diagnose; Justify; Intervene
C. Validate; Direct; Justify; Intervene
D. Evaluate; Direct; Justify; Improve
2 Comments on “what are the four reasons to monitor and measure?”
Michael McNeilsays:
Page 77 Continual Service
4.3.10 Using measurement and metrics
Metrics can be used for multiple purposes such as to:
■ Validate – are we supporting the strategy and vision?
■ Justify – do we have the right targets and metrics?
■ Direct – based on factual data, people can be guided
to change behaviour
■ Intervene – take corrective actions such as identifying
improvement opportunities.
Service measurements and metrics should be used to drive
decisions. Depending on what is being measured the
decision could be a strategic, tactical or operational
decision. This is the case for CSI. There are many
improvement opportunities but there is often only a
limited budget to address the improvement opportunities,
so decisions must be made. Which improvement
opportunities will support the business strategy and goals,
and which ones will support the IT goals and objectives?
What are the Return on Investment and Value on
Investment opportunities? These two items are discussed
in more detail in section 4.4.
Another key use of measurement and metrics is for
comparison purposes. Measures by themselves may tell
the organization very little unless there is a standard or
baseline against which to assess the data. Measuring only
one particular characteristic of performance in isolation is
meaningless unless it is compared with something else
that is relevant. The following comparisons are useful:
■ Comparison against the baseline
■ Comparison against a target or goal
■ Comparison with other organizations – be sure to
understand that the strategy, goals and objectives of
other organizations may not be in alignment with
yours so there may be driving factors in the other
organization that you don’t have or it could be the
other way around
■ Comparison over time such as day to day, week to
week, month to month, quarter to quarter, or year to
year
■ Comparison between different business units
■ Comparison between different services.
Measures of quality allow for measuring trends and the
rate of change over a period of time. Examples could be
measuring trends against standards that are set up either
internally or externally and could include benchmarks, or it
could be measuring trends with standards and targets to
be established. This is often done when first setting up
baselines.
A minor or short-term deviation from targets should not
necessarily lead to an improvement initiative. It is
important to set the criteria for the deviations before an
improvement programme is initiated.
Comparing and analysing trends against service level
targets or an actual Service Level Agreement is important
as it allows for early identification of fluctuations in service
delivery or quality. This is important not only for internal
service providers but also when services have been
outsourced. It is important to identify any deviations and
discuss them with the external service provider in order to
avoid any supplier relationship problems. Speed and
efficiency of communication when there are missed
targets is essential to the continuation of a strong
relationship.
RCsays:
Continual Service Improvement
3.7.2 Value to business
Basically, there are four reasons to monitor and measure:
To validate – monitoring and measuring to validate
previous decisions
To direct – monitoring and measuring to set direction
for activities in order to meet set targets. It is the most
prevalent reason for monitoring and measuring
To justify – monitoring and measuring to justify, with
factual evidence or proof, that a course of action is
required
To intervene – monitoring and measuring to identify
a point of intervention including subsequent changes
and corrective actions.
Page 77 Continual Service
4.3.10 Using measurement and metrics
Metrics can be used for multiple purposes such as to:
■ Validate – are we supporting the strategy and vision?
■ Justify – do we have the right targets and metrics?
■ Direct – based on factual data, people can be guided
to change behaviour
■ Intervene – take corrective actions such as identifying
improvement opportunities.
Service measurements and metrics should be used to drive
decisions. Depending on what is being measured the
decision could be a strategic, tactical or operational
decision. This is the case for CSI. There are many
improvement opportunities but there is often only a
limited budget to address the improvement opportunities,
so decisions must be made. Which improvement
opportunities will support the business strategy and goals,
and which ones will support the IT goals and objectives?
What are the Return on Investment and Value on
Investment opportunities? These two items are discussed
in more detail in section 4.4.
Another key use of measurement and metrics is for
comparison purposes. Measures by themselves may tell
the organization very little unless there is a standard or
baseline against which to assess the data. Measuring only
one particular characteristic of performance in isolation is
meaningless unless it is compared with something else
that is relevant. The following comparisons are useful:
■ Comparison against the baseline
■ Comparison against a target or goal
■ Comparison with other organizations – be sure to
understand that the strategy, goals and objectives of
other organizations may not be in alignment with
yours so there may be driving factors in the other
organization that you don’t have or it could be the
other way around
■ Comparison over time such as day to day, week to
week, month to month, quarter to quarter, or year to
year
■ Comparison between different business units
■ Comparison between different services.
Measures of quality allow for measuring trends and the
rate of change over a period of time. Examples could be
measuring trends against standards that are set up either
internally or externally and could include benchmarks, or it
could be measuring trends with standards and targets to
be established. This is often done when first setting up
baselines.
A minor or short-term deviation from targets should not
necessarily lead to an improvement initiative. It is
important to set the criteria for the deviations before an
improvement programme is initiated.
Comparing and analysing trends against service level
targets or an actual Service Level Agreement is important
as it allows for early identification of fluctuations in service
delivery or quality. This is important not only for internal
service providers but also when services have been
outsourced. It is important to identify any deviations and
discuss them with the external service provider in order to
avoid any supplier relationship problems. Speed and
efficiency of communication when there are missed
targets is essential to the continuation of a strong
relationship.
Continual Service Improvement
3.7.2 Value to business
Basically, there are four reasons to monitor and measure:
To validate – monitoring and measuring to validate
previous decisions
To direct – monitoring and measuring to set direction
for activities in order to meet set targets. It is the most
prevalent reason for monitoring and measuring
To justify – monitoring and measuring to justify, with
factual evidence or proof, that a course of action is
required
To intervene – monitoring and measuring to identify
a point of intervention including subsequent changes
and corrective actions.