PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

what are the four reasons to monitor and measure?

To add value to the business, what are the four reasons to monitor and measure?

PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

A.
Validate; Direct; Justify; Improve

B.
Evaluate; Diagnose; Justify; Intervene

C.
Validate; Direct; Justify; Intervene

D.
Evaluate; Direct; Justify; Improve

2 Comments on “what are the four reasons to monitor and measure?

  1. Michael McNeil says:

    Page 77 Continual Service

    4.3.10 Using measurement and metrics
    Metrics can be used for multiple purposes such as to:
    ■ Validate – are we supporting the strategy and vision?
    ■ Justify – do we have the right targets and metrics?
    ■ Direct – based on factual data, people can be guided
    to change behaviour
    ■ Intervene – take corrective actions such as identifying
    improvement opportunities.
    Service measurements and metrics should be used to drive
    decisions. Depending on what is being measured the
    decision could be a strategic, tactical or operational
    decision. This is the case for CSI. There are many
    improvement opportunities but there is often only a
    limited budget to address the improvement opportunities,
    so decisions must be made. Which improvement
    opportunities will support the business strategy and goals,
    and which ones will support the IT goals and objectives?
    What are the Return on Investment and Value on
    Investment opportunities? These two items are discussed
    in more detail in section 4.4.
    Another key use of measurement and metrics is for
    comparison purposes. Measures by themselves may tell
    the organization very little unless there is a standard or
    baseline against which to assess the data. Measuring only
    one particular characteristic of performance in isolation is
    meaningless unless it is compared with something else
    that is relevant. The following comparisons are useful:
    ■ Comparison against the baseline
    ■ Comparison against a target or goal
    ■ Comparison with other organizations – be sure to
    understand that the strategy, goals and objectives of
    other organizations may not be in alignment with
    yours so there may be driving factors in the other
    organization that you don’t have or it could be the
    other way around
    ■ Comparison over time such as day to day, week to
    week, month to month, quarter to quarter, or year to
    year
    ■ Comparison between different business units
    ■ Comparison between different services.
    Measures of quality allow for measuring trends and the
    rate of change over a period of time. Examples could be
    measuring trends against standards that are set up either
    internally or externally and could include benchmarks, or it
    could be measuring trends with standards and targets to
    be established. This is often done when first setting up
    baselines.
    A minor or short-term deviation from targets should not
    necessarily lead to an improvement initiative. It is
    important to set the criteria for the deviations before an
    improvement programme is initiated.
    Comparing and analysing trends against service level
    targets or an actual Service Level Agreement is important
    as it allows for early identification of fluctuations in service
    delivery or quality. This is important not only for internal
    service providers but also when services have been
    outsourced. It is important to identify any deviations and
    discuss them with the external service provider in order to
    avoid any supplier relationship problems. Speed and
    efficiency of communication when there are missed
    targets is essential to the continuation of a strong
    relationship.

  2. RC says:

    Continual Service Improvement

    3.7.2 Value to business

    Basically, there are four reasons to monitor and measure:

    To validate – monitoring and measuring to validate
    previous decisions

    To direct – monitoring and measuring to set direction
    for activities in order to meet set targets. It is the most
    prevalent reason for monitoring and measuring

    To justify – monitoring and measuring to justify, with
    factual evidence or proof, that a course of action is
    required

    To intervene – monitoring and measuring to identify
    a point of intervention including subsequent changes
    and corrective actions.


Leave a Reply