Which is the CORRECT list for the three levels of a multi level Service Level Agreement(SLA)?
A. Technology, Customer, User
B. Corporate, Customer, Service
C. Corporate, Customer, Technology
D. Service, User, IT
2 Comments on “Which is the CORRECT list for the three levels of a multi level Service Level Agreement(SLA)?”
Michael McNeilsays:
Multi-level SLAs
Some organizations have chosen to adopt a multi-level
SLA structure. For example, a three-layer structure as
follows:
■ Corporate level: covering all the generic SLM issues
appropriate to every customer throughout the
organization. These issues are likely to be less volatile,
so updates are less frequently required
■ Customer level: covering all SLM issues relevant to
the particular customer group or business unit,
regardless of the service being used
■ Service level: covering all SLM issues relevant to the
specific service, in relation to a specific customer
group (one for each service covered by the SLA).
Rudy Wiloposays:
Mind you to be careful, the ITIL book sated these 3 as “what a 3 layered structure MIGHT look like”. Thus the structure explained above is exemplary at best, not recommended.
Multi-level SLAs
Some organizations have chosen to adopt a multi-level
SLA structure. For example, a three-layer structure as
follows:
■ Corporate level: covering all the generic SLM issues
appropriate to every customer throughout the
organization. These issues are likely to be less volatile,
so updates are less frequently required
■ Customer level: covering all SLM issues relevant to
the particular customer group or business unit,
regardless of the service being used
■ Service level: covering all SLM issues relevant to the
specific service, in relation to a specific customer
group (one for each service covered by the SLA).
Mind you to be careful, the ITIL book sated these 3 as “what a 3 layered structure MIGHT look like”. Thus the structure explained above is exemplary at best, not recommended.