What happens to the total number of shares provided to a resource pool by the parent pool (%Shares) if a virtual machine is removed from the resource pool?
A.
Remains the same
B.
Decreases
C.
Increases
D.
Remains the same if a custom share value was configured. Increases if a high, medium, or low value was configured
From http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-50/topic/com.vmware.ICbase/PDF/vsphere-esxi-vcenter-server-50-resource-management-guide.pdf
When you remove a virtual machine from a resource pool, the total number of shares associated with the
resource pool decreases, so that each remaining share represents more resources.
0
0
This question is worded a bit tricky, but if I understand it correctly, it’s asking what would happen to the child pools resource value from the parent if a VM is removed from the child pool. If that is indeed the case, the answer should be A, it remains the same. Removing the VM from the child resource pool may affect the total number of shares and their corresponding value inside the pool, but it’s %shares from it’s parent will remain the same. I just tested this in a lab to confirm.
0
0
same what say Jon, %share remain the same
0
0
this question was in my exam of aug 2012
0
0
aiotestking.com has 3 google results for terms in this question, this being one of them.
this one, which does not mention %SHARES, has an answer of decreasing.
http://www.aiotestking.com/vmware/2012/07/what-happens-to-the-total-number-of-shares-available-to-the-children-of-a-resource-pool-if-a-virtual-machine-is-powered-off-inside-the-resource-pool/
this one, which mentions %SHARES, has an answer of remains the same
http://www.aiotestking.com/vmware/2012/02/what-happened-to-the-total-number-of-shares-provided-to-a-resource-pool-by-the-parent-pool-shares-if-a-virtual-machine-is-removed-from-the-resource-pool/
seems to be logical.
0
0
yes , I’ll fix all questions if it wrong
0
0