Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series
contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one
correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will
not appear in the review screen.
You have an In-Place Hold that was implemented by running the following command:
New-MailboxSearch –Name “Hold-ProjectX” –SourceMailboxes “User1”.
You are notified that the In-Place Hold is no longer required.
You need to ensure that the mailbox data can be deleted by using retention policies.
Solution: You run Set-MailboxSearch “Hold-ProjectX” –InPlaceHoldEnabled $false.
Does this meet the goal?
A.
Yes
B.
No
Correct.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd979797(v=exchg.150).aspx
0
0
Strictly speaking, no. There is a second command missing, Remove-MailboxSearch “Hold-ProjectX”, as stated in that link under Remove an In-Place Hold and as you state yourself in your comment in the previous question.
0
0
“You need to ensure that the mailbox data can be deleted by using retention policies.”
I reckon this will be done though because you’ve disabled to inPlace hold. It’s just that the searchquery will remain, right?
0
0
I think you are right, and with this understanding the wording of the question makes the most sense, so I hereby agree with Yes. 🙂
0
0