Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series
contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one
correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will
not appear in the review screen.
You have an In-Place Hold that was implemented by running the following command:
New-MailboxSearch –Name “Hold-ProjectX” –SourceMailboxes “User1”.
You are notified that the In-Place Hold is no longer required.
You need to ensure that the mailbox data can be deleted by using retention policies.
Solution: You run the Remove-MailboxSearch “Hold-ProjectX”.
Does this meet the goal?
A.
Yes
B.
No
Correct.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd979797(v=exchg.150).aspx
0
0
Ok, this is the 3rd question in a row that you used this same link. This is the same type of question just like the last two. It is missing some commands for this to be true.
0
0
I now see the difference! it is missing the $false so it makes this one No
0
0
Correct. You can’t remove an in-place hold without first disabling the hold.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd298130(v=exchg.160).aspx
1
0
1+
0
0