Refer to the Exhibit.

A customer is trying to configure a router to peer using EBGP to a neighbor. As shown in the
exhibit, two links are being used for this configuration. The goal of this configuration is to loadbalance traffic across both EBGP links.
Which configuration accomplishes this goal?

A.
{master:0}[edit]
Juniper@External-BGP# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65543;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
lab@Area-0-ABR# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;

B.
{master:0}[edit]
Juniper@External-BGP# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65543;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
lab@Area-0-ABR# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
forwarding-table {
export load-balance;
}
{master:0}[edit]
lab@Area-0-ABR# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance
term balance {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
accept;
}
}

C.
{master:0}[edit]
Juniper@External-BGP# show protocols bgp
group External {
multi-path;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65543;
neighbor 192.168.5.1;
}
{master:0}[edit]
lab@Area-0-ABR# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;

D.
{master:0}[edit]
Juniper@External-BGP# show protocols bgp
group External {
multipath;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65543;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
{master:0}[edit]
lab@Area-0-ABR# show routing-options
static {
route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop 192.168.2.1;
}
autonomous-system 65432;