Which two statements are true about terms in a routing policy? (Choose two)
A.
A then statement is mandatory in a term
B.
If a term does not contain a from statement, all routers match
C.
If a term does not contain a from statement, the Junos OS will not commit
D.
A then statement is not mandatory in a term
A then statement is NOT mandatory in a routing policy term
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.2/topics/usage-guidelines/policy-configuring-actions-in-routing-policy-terms.html
0
0
Agree: Answer is C,D
0
0
Victor, did you even bother to click on the link and read it??? Just as a courtesy, please read the following:
“The then statement is optional. If you omit it, one of the following occurs:
The next term in the routing policy, if one is present, is evaluated.
If there are no more terms in the routing policy, the next routing policy, if one is present, is evaluated.
If there are no more terms or routing policies, the accept or reject action specified by the default policy is taken. For more information, see Default Routing Policies and Actions.”
0
0
The answer is B,D.
0
0
“c” is wrong. I just checked it my lab
hh@routerA# set firewall family inet filter hh-test term hh-term then accept
[edit]
hh@routerA## commit check
configuration check succeeds
so the correct answer is B & D
0
0
Junos routing essentials chpt. 3-8 reads ” If all the match conditions specified in the from statement are true (or if no statement is specified), all the actions in the then statement are executed
0
0
hh is right. The correct answer here is B and D
0
0
Yes, it is wrong, is B and D
0
0
the correct answer is B and D not C.
0
0
correct answer
B and D
0
0
Correct: B & D
To continue the test – A and B
0
0