A datacenter has suffered repeated burglaries that lead to equipment theft and arson. In the past, the thieves have demonstrated a determination to bypass any
installed safeguards. After mantraps had been installed to prevent tailgating, the thieves crashed through the wall of the datacenter with a vehicle after normal
business hours. Which of teh following options could further improve the physical safety and security of the datacenter? (select TWO).
A.
Cipher locks
B.
CCTV
C.
Escape routes
D.
K-rated fencing
E.
FM200 fire suppression
“Arson” is specifically mentioned in the question.
0
0
So burglars are invading the date centre in order to conduct “theft and arson”
The questions is talking about PREVENTION and not MITIGATION.
In other words, I am more concerned about stopping “theft and arson” happening in the first place and to identify the culprits which clearly were getting away with it for a very long time again and again
So to my mind B-CCTV and D-K rated fences are the best answer
E- Fm200 fire suppression will stop a fire, but it won’t prevent the actual action of committing arson (so it is not preventative at such, but remedial in nature
K Ratings specifically measure how well a barrier such as a fence, gate, or bollard can stop an incoming vehicle. The ratings are dependent on the vehicle’s weight and speed as well, with a standard vehicle weighing in at 15,000 pounds. The intention of the K Ratings is to assess how strong a fence is in order to prevent a crashing vehicle from penetrating a barrier more than 36 inches beyond the fence bed.
For example: a fence that can withstand a vehicle traveling 30 miles per hour will receive a level K4 rating. However, a fence that can withstand a vehicle traveling 50 miles per hour will receive a level K12 rating. These ratings are useful in helping organizations and companies determine what fence and what provider should be issued a contract.
1
0