Refer to the Exhibit.

You are configuring an EBGP peer in a transit environment. You must advertise routes learned
from other EBGP peers in your AS. Any routes originated from within your AS should have a MED
of 7000 set. Any routes that originate in AS65222 should be prepended four times. Any routes that
transit AS701 should have a MED set to 6. This scenario results in the unintended advertisement
of internal 10.0.0.0/8 networks to your peer.
What caused the accidental advertisement of internal networks to your EBGP peer?

Which option is a valid IPv6 multicast address?

Refer to the Exhibit.

Looking at the traceoptions output in the exhibit, why are the OSPF routers stuck in Init state?

Refer to the Exhibit.

The ASBR in NSSA Area 0.0.0.1 is injecting three external prefixes (200.200.0.0/16,
200.200.10/24, and 100.100.0.0/24). You must configure the ABR router in the exhibit to translate
only one route (200.200.0.0/16) into the backbone area.Which configuration accomplishes the
goal?

Refer to the Exhibit.

As shown in the exhibit, the 10.10/16 prefix is redistributed into OSPF through R2 and R5. R2 is
advertising the prefix with a Type 1 metric of 100 and R5 is advertising the prefix with a Type 2
metric of 10.What is the preferred path to reach 10.10/16 from R6?

Refer to the Exhibit.

A customer is trying to configure a router to peer using EBGP to a neighbor. As shown in the
exhibit, two links are being used for this configuration. The goal of this configuration is to loadbalance traffic across both EBGP links.
Which configuration accomplishes this goal?

Refer to the Exhibit.

Site A is sending voice traffic marked with DSCP code EF. SRX A has the default CoS classifier.
Into which forwarding class is SRX A classifying traffic?

Refer to the Exhibit.

Based on the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)

Refer to the Exhibit.

Examine the output of the show bgp summary command shown in the exhibit.
From which BGP peer is the router receiving IPv6 routes?

Refer to the Exhibit.

The output in the exhibit is from a router with the default scheduler configuration.
What is a possible cause of the drops in the expedited-forwarding queue?