Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit —
[edit security idp]
user@srx# show | no-more
idp-policy basic {
rulebase-ips {
rule 1 {
match {
from-zone untrust;
source-address any;
to-zone trust;
destination-address any;
application default;
attacks {
custom-attacks data-inject;
}
}
then {
action {
recommended;
}
notification {
log-attacks;

}
}
}
}
}
active-policy basic;
custom-attack data-inject {
recommended-action close;
severity critical;
attack-type {
signature {
context mssql-query;
pattern “SELECT * FROM accounts”;
direction client-to-server;
}
}
}

— Exhibit —
You have configured the custom attack signature shown in the exhibit. This configuration is valid,
but you want to improve the efficiency and performance of your IDP.
Which two commands should you use? (Choose two.)

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
You receive complaints from users that their Web browsing sessions keep dropping prematurely.
Upon investigation, you find that the IDP policy shown in the exhibit is detecting the users’
sessions as HTTP:WIN-CMD:WIN-CMD-EXE attacks, even though their sessions are not actual
attacks. You must allow these sessions but still inspect for all other relevant attacks.
How would you configure your SRX device to meet this goal?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
In the exhibit, the SRX device has hosts connected to interface ge-0/0/1 and ge-0/0/6. The devices
are not able to ping each other. What is causing this behavior?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
Referring to the exhibit, a pair of SRX3600s is in an active/passive chassis cluster configured for
transparent mode. Which type of traffic would traverse the secondary SRX3600 (node 1)?

Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit —
user@srx# show security datapath-debug
capture-file pkt-cap-file format pcap size 5m;
action-profile {
pkt-cap-profile {
event np-ingress {
packet-dump;
}
}
}
packet-filter pkt-filter {
action-profile pkt-capture;
source-prefix 1.2.3.4/32;
}

— Exhibit —
You want to capture transit traffic passing through your SRX3600. You add the configuration
shown in the exhibit but do not see entries added to the capture file.
What is causing the problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
Host traffic is traversing through an IPsec tunnel. Users are complaining of intermittent issues with
their connection.

Referring to the exhibit, what is the problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit —
CID-0:RT: flow process pak fast ifl 71 in_ifp ge-0/0/5.0
CID-0:RT: ge-0/0/5.0:10.0.0.2/55892->192.168.1.2/80, tcp, flag 2 syn
CID-0:RT: find flow: table 0x5a386c90, hash 50728(0xffff), sa 10.0.0.2, da 192.168.1.2, sp 55892,
dp 80, proto 6, tok 7
CID-0:RT: no session found, start first path. in_tunnel – 0x0, from_cp_flag – 0
CID-0:RT: flow_first_create_session
CID-0:RT: flow_first_in_dst_nat: in <ge-0/0/5.0>, out <N/A> dst_adr 192.168.1.2, sp 55892, dp 80

CID-0:RT: chose interface ge-0/0/5.0 as incoming nat if.
CID-0:RT:flow_first_rule_dst_xlatE. DST no-xlatE. 0.0.0.0(0) to 192.168.1.2(80)
CID-0:RT:flow_first_routinG. vr_id 0, call flow_route_lookup(): src_ip 10.0.0.2, x_dst_ip
192.168.1.2, in ifp ge-0/0/5.0, out ifp N/A sp 55892, dp 80, ip_proto 6, tos 10
CID-0:RT:Doing DESTINATION addr route-lookup
CID-0:RT: routed (x_dst_ip 192.168.1.2) from LAN (ge-0/0/5.0 in 0) to ge-0/0/1.0, Next-hop:
172.16.32.1
CID-0:RT:flow_first_policy_searcH. policy search from zone LAN-> zone WAN
(0x0,0xda540050,0x50)
CID-0:RT:Policy lkup: vsys 0 zone(7:LAN) -> zone(6:WAN) scope:0
CID-0:RT: 10.0.0.2/55892 -> 192.168.1.2/80 proto 6
CID-0:RT:Policy lkup: vsys 0 zone(5:Unknown) -> zone(5:Unknown) scope:0
CID-0:RT: 10.0.0.2/55892 -> 192.168.1.2/80 proto 6
CID-0:RT: app 6, timeout 1800s, curr ageout 20s
CID-0:RT: packet dropped, denied by policy
CID-0:RT: denied by policy default-policy-00(2), dropping pkt
CID-0:RT: packet dropped, policy deny.
CID-0:RT: flow find session returns error.
CID-0:RT: —– flow_process_pkt rc 0x7 (fp rc -1)
CID-0:RT:jsf sess close notify
CID-0:RT:flow_ipv4_del_flow: sess , in hash 32

— Exhibit —
A host is not able to communicate with a Web server.
Based on the logs shown in the exhibit, what is the problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –

— Exhibit —
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)

Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit —
user@srx> show security flow session
Session ID. 7724, Policy namE. default-permit/4, Timeout: 2
In: 1.1.70.6/17 –> 100.0.0.1/2326;icmp, IF. ge-0/0/3
Out: 10.1.10.5/2326 –> 1.1.70.6/17;icmp, IF. ge-0/0/2
Session ID. 18408, Policy namE. default-permit/4, Timeout: 2
In: 10.1.10.5/64513 –> 1.1.70.6/512;icmp, IF. ge-0/0/2.0
Out: 1.1.70.6/512 –> 100.0.0.1/64513;icmp, IF. ge-0/0/3.10

— Exhibit —
A user has reported a traffic drop issue between a host with the 10.1.10.5 internal IP address and
a host with the 1.1.70.6 IP address. The traffic transits an SRX240 acting as a NAT translator. You
are investigating the issue on the SRX240 using the output shown in the exhibit.
Regarding this scenario, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)

Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit —
[edit forwarding-options]
user@srx240# show

packet-capture {
file filename my-packet-capture;
maximum-capture-size 1500;
}

— Exhibit —
Referring to the exhibit, you are attempting to perform a packet capture on an SRX240 to
troubleshoot an SSH issue in your network. However, no information appears in the packet
capture file.
Which firewall filter must you apply to the necessary interface to collect data for the packet
capture?