PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

Category: JN0-633

Exam JN0-633: Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC)

How do you accomplish this goal?

Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit —

security {
nat {
destination {
pool Web-Server {
address 10.0.1.5/32;
}
rule-set From-Internet {
from zone Untrust;
rule To-Web-Server {
match {
source-address 0.0.0.0/0;
destination-address 172.16.1.7/32;
}
then {
destination-nat pool Web-Server;
}
}
}
}
}
zones {
security-zone Untrust {
address-book {
address Web-Server-External 172.16.1.7/32;
address Web-Server-Internal 10.0.1.5/32;
}
interfaces {

ge-0/0/0.0;
}
}
security-zone DMZ {
address-book {
address Web-Server-External 172.16.1.7/32;
address Web-Server-Internal 10.0.1.5/32;
}
interfaces {
ge-0/0/1.0;
}
}
}
}

— Exhibit —
You are migrating from one external address block to a different external address block. You want
to enable a smooth transition to the new address block. You temporarily want to allow external
users to contact the Web server using both the existing external address as well as the new
external address 192.168.1.1.
How do you accomplish this goal?

What are two reasons for this behavior?

Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit —
Feb 8 10:39:40 Unable to find phase-1 policy as remote peer:2.2.2.2 is not recognized.
Feb 8 10:39:40 KMD_PM_P1_POLICY_LOOKUP_FAILURE. Policy lookup for Phase-1
[responder] failed for p1_local=ipv4(any:0,[0..3]=1.1.1.2) p1_remote=ipv4(any:0,[0..3]=2.2.2.2)
Feb 8 10:39:40 1.1.1.2:500 (Responder) <-> 2.2.2.2:500 { dbe1d0af – a4d6d829 f9ed3bba [-1] /
0x00000000 } IP; Error = No proposal chosen (14)

— Exhibit —
According to the log shown in the exhibit, you notice that the IPsec session is not establishing.
What are two reasons for this behavior? (Choose two.)

what solves the issue?

Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit —
[edit security]
user@srx# show
idp {
idp-policy NewPolicy {
rulebase-exempt {
rule 1 {
description AllowExternalRule;
match {
source-address any;
destination-address
}
}
}
}
}

— Exhibit —
You are performing the initial IDP installation on your new SRX device. You have configured the
IDP exempt rulebase as shown in the exhibit, but the commit is not successful.
Referring to the exhibit, what solves the issue?

What are two reasons for this behavior?

Refer to the Exhibit.

— Exhibit —
[edit security idp]
user@srx# show
security-package {
url https://services.netscreen.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi;
automatic {
start-time “2012-12-11.01:00:00 +0000”;
interval 120;
enable;
}
}

— Exhibit —
You have configured your SRX device to download and install attack signature updates as shown
in the exhibit. You discover that updates are not being downloaded.
What are two reasons for this behavior? (Choose two.)


Page 10 of 11« First...7891011