###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.
Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.
The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.
DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1
• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###
You need to recommend which tasks must be performed to meet the technical requirements of the
research and development (R&D) department.
Which two tasks should you recommend? (Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
Choose two.)
A.
Create a new global address list (GAL) and a new address book policy.
B.
Modify the permissions of the default global address list (GAL), and then create a new GAL.
C.
Run the Update AddressList cmdlet.
D.
Run the Set-Mailbox cmdlet.
E.
Create an OAB virtual directory.
A–While default GAL contains all objects, when an organization is required to provide separation between different departments to achieve compliance or other business reasons, a single default GAL doesn’t serve the purpose. To address the requirement, you need to create additional global address lists and provide separation using Address Book policies. The process is also referred to as Global Address List (GAL) segmentation.
D–The logical separation still isn’t achieved since user mailboxes need to be configured to
start using their corresponding GALs and OABs. You can configure user mailboxes to use new
GALs and OABs by using the Set-Mailbox cmdlet.
0
0