###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

HOTSPOT
You need to recommend which configurations must be set for each network.
Which configurations should you recommend?
To answer, select the appropriate configurations for each network in the answer area.

###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

An administrator recommends removing EDGE1 from the implementation plan and adding a new
Client Access server named CAS-8 instead.
You need to identify which anti-spam feature will NOT be available on CAS-8.
Which anti-spam feature should you identify?

###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

You need to recommend which task is required to prepare Active Directory for the planned
Exchange Server 2013 implementation.
What should you recommend?

###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

You need to recommend a design that meets the technical requirements for communication
between Fabrikam and
A.Datum.
Which three actions should you perform in fabrikam.com? (Each correct answer presents part of the
solution. Choose three.)

###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

DRAG DROP
You are evaluating the implementation of a second Edge Transport server named EDGE2 in the
Amsterdam office.
You need to recommend which tasks must be performed to ensure that email messages can be sent
by the organization if a single Edge Transport server fails.
Which three actions should you include in the recommendation?
To answer, move the three appropriate actions from the list of actions to the answer area and
arrange them in the correct order.

###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

You need to recommend which type of group must be used to create the planned department lists.
Which type of group should you recommend?

###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

You need to recommend which tasks must be performed to meet the technical requirements of the
research and development (R&D) department.
Which two tasks should you recommend? (Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
Choose two.)

###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

You are testing the planned implementation of Domain Security.
You discover that users fail to exchange domain-secured email messages.
You open the Exchange Management Shell and discover the output shown in the exhibit. (Click the
Exhibit button.)

You need to ensure that users can exchange email messages by using Domain Security.
Which two parameters should you modify by using the Set-SendConnector cmdlet? (Each correct
answer presents part of the solution. Choose two.)

###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

HOTSPOT
You need to recommend which script the administrators must run to create the reports required to
meet the technical requirements.
Which script should you recommend?
To answer, select the appropriate script in the answer area.

###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 1
1Fabrikam, Inc
Overview
Fabrikam, Inc., is a pharmaceutical company located in Europe. The company has 5,000 users. The
company is finalizing plans to deploy an Exchange Server 2013 organization.
The company has offices in Paris and Amsterdam.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains an Active Directory domain named fabrikam.com. An Active Directory site
exists for each office.
Network Infrastructure
The roles and location of each server are configured as shown in the following table.

Client computers run either Windows 7 or Windows 8 and have Microsoft Office 2010 installed.
The Paris office uses the 192.168.1.0/24 IP range. The Amsterdam office uses the 192.168.2.0/24 IP
range.
The offices connect to each other by using a high-speed, low-latency WAN link. Each office has a 10-
Mbps connection to the Internet.
Planned Exchange Infrastructure
The company plans to deploy five servers that run Exchange Server. The servers will be configured as
shown in the following table.

The company plans to have mailbox databases replicated in database availability groups (DAGs). The
mailbox databases and DAGs will be configured as shown in the following table.

DAG1 will use FS1 as a file share witness. DAG2 will use FS3 as a file share witness.
You plan to create the following networks on each DAG:
• A dedicated replication network named DAGNET1
• A MAPI network named DAGNET2
All replication traffic will run on DAGNET1. All client connections will run on DAGNET2. Client
connections must never occur on DAGNET1. Replication traffic must only occur on DAGNET2 if
DAGNET1 is unavailable.
Each Exchange Server 2013 Mailbox server will be configured to have two network adapters.
The following two mailbox databases will not be replicated as part of the DAGs:
• A mailbox database named AccountingDB that is hosted on EX1

• A mailbox database named TempStaffDB that is hosted on EX4
EDGE1 will have an Edge Subscription configured, with both EX1 and EX2 as targets.
Requirements
Planned Changes
An external consultant reviews the Exchange Server 2013 deployment plan and identifies the
following areas of concern:
• The DAGs will not be monitored.
• Multiple Edge Transport servers are required to prevent the potential for a single point of
failure.
Technical Requirements
Fabrikam must meet the following technical requirements:
• Email must be evaluated for SPAM before the email enters the internal network.
• Production system patching must minimize downtime to achieve the highest possible service
to users.
• Users must be able to use the Exchange Control Panel to autonomously join and disjoin their
department’s distribution lists.
• Users must be able to access all Internet-facing Exchange Server services by using the names
of mail.fabrikam.com and autodiscover.fabrikam.com.
The company establishes a partnership with another company named A. Datum Corporation. A.
Datum uses the SMTP suffix adatum.com for all email addresses. Fabrikam plans to exchange
sensitive information with A. Datum and requires that the email messages sent between the two
companies be encrypted. The solution must use Domain Security.
Users in the research and development (R&D) department must be able to view only the mailboxes
of the users in their department from Microsoft Outlook. The users in all of the other departments
must be prevented from viewing the mailboxes of the R&D users from Outlook.
Administrators plan to produce HTML reports that contain information about recent status changes
to the mailbox databases.
Fabrikam is evaluating whether to abort its plan to implement an Exchange Server 2010 Edge
Transport server and to implement a Client Access server in the Paris office instead. The Client
Access server will have anti-spam agents installed.
###EndCaseStudy###

You need to recommend which recovery solution will restore access to all of the mailboxes in
AccountingDB if EX1 fails. The solution must restore access to email messages as quickly as possible.
Which recovery solution should you recommend?