PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

Category: JN0-661

Exam JN0-661: Service Provider Routing and Switching, Professional

Which routes will RR advertise to R5?

6 comments

Click the Exhibit button.

RR:
protocols {
bgp {
group ebgd {
type external;
peer-as 100;
neighbor 172.16.1.1 {
description R1;
}
}
group ibgp {
type internal;
neighbor 172.16.1.2 {
description R2;
}
group cluster {
type internal;
neighbor 172.16.1.3 {
description R3;
}
neighbor 172.16.1.4 {
description R4;
}
neighbor 172.16.1.5 {
description R5;
}
cluster 0.0.0.1;
no-client-reflect;}
}
}
Router RR is receiving routes from R1, R2, R3, and R4 as shown in the exhibit.
Which routes will RR advertise to R5? (Choose two.)

Which three additions must be made to the configuration…

5 comments

You need to ensure that your high-priority traffic uses the best-possible route while your best-effort traffic uses a
lower preference route. You want to use CoS-based forwarding to use the DSCP values of the different types of
traffic to assign the LSP that should be used for the next hop.
Which three additions must be made to the configuration to satisfy the requirement? (Choose three.)

Which action should you take to allow communication bet…

4 comments

Click the Exhibit button.
[edit]
user@PE-1# show protocols
rsvp {
interface all;
}
mpls {
label-switched-path p1 {
from 1.1.1.1;
to 4.4.4.4;
no-cspf;
}
interface all;
}
bgp {
group Int {
type internal;
local-address 1.1.1.1;
family inet {
unicast;
}
family inet-vpn {
unicast;
}
neighbor 2.2.2.2;
neighbor 3.3.3.3;
neighbor 4.4.4.4;
}
}
ospf {
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/2.0;
interface lo0.0;
}
}
[edit]
user@PE-1# show routing-instances CE-1
instance-type vrf;
interface ge-0/0/1.0;
route-destinguisher 65305:395;
vrf-target target:65412:100;
routing-options {
static {
route 100.100.100.0/24 next-hop
192.168.1.100;
}
}
[edit]
user@P-1# show protocols
rsvp {
interface all;
}
mpls {
interface all;}
ospf {
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/1.0;
interface ge-0/0/2.0;
interface lo0,0;
}
}
[edit]
user@P-2# show protocols
rsvp {
interface all;
}
mpls {
interface all;
}
ospf {
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/1.0;
interface ge-0/0/2.0;
interface lo0,0;
}
}
[edit]
user@PE-2# show protocols
rsvp {
interface all;
}
mpls {
label-switched-path p2 {
from 4.4.4.4;
to 1.1.1.1;
no-cspf;
}
interface all;
}
bgp {
group Int {
type internal;
local address 4.4.4.4;
family inet {
unicast;
}
family inet-vpn {
unicast;
}
neighbor 2.2.2.2;
neighbor 3.3.3.3;
neighbor 1.1.1.1;
}
}
ospf {
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/2.0;
interface lo0.0;
}}
[edit]
user@PE2# show routing-instances CE-2
instance-type vrf;
interfcae ge-0/0/1.0;
route-distinguisher 65305:395;
vrf-target target:64512🐺100;
routing-options {
static {
route 200.200.200.0/24 next-hop
10.1.1.100;
}
}
Referring to the exhibit, you have configured an L3VPN that connects Site-1 and Site-2 together, but the BGP
routes are not showing up on the PE routers. The topology in this scenario is shown below.
Site-1 > PE-1 > P-1 > P-2 > PE-2 > Site-2
Which action should you take to allow communication between Site-1 and Site-2?

Which configuration change would satisfy this requirement?

One comment

Click the Exhibit button.
user@R1# show interfaces lo0
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.220.1.1/32;
}
family iso {
address 49.0001.0010.0220.0101.00;
}
}
{edit protocols isis}
user@R1# show
interface ge-1/0/1.0 {
level 2 disable;
}
interface ge-1/1/0.0 {
level 1 disable;
}
interface ge-1/1/1.0 {
level 2 disable;
}
interface lo0.0;
user@R7# show interfaces lo0
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.220.1.7/32;}
family iso {
address 49.0002.0010.0220.0107.00;
}
}
{edit protocols isis]
user@R7 show
interface ge-1/0/1.0 {
level 2 disable;
}
interface lo0.0
You are trying to establish an IS-IS Level 1 adjacency over ge-1/0/1 between R1 and R7 without impacting the
other IS-IS adjacencies on R1.
Which configuration change would satisfy this requirement?


Page 3 of 712345...Last »