Which of the following logical interfaces have failover and migration capabilities between nodes? (choose all that apply)
A. Data (FC, iSCSI)
B. Cluster management
C. Data (CIFS, NFS)
D. Node management
E. Cluster interconnect
7 Comments on “Which of the following logical interfaces have failover and migration capabilities between nodes?”
Pawansays:
Data LIF – THESE INTERFACES CAN MIGRATE OR FAIL OVER THROUGHOUT THE CLUSTER.
Cluster-management LIF – THE LIF CAN FAIL OVER TO ANY NODE-MANAGEMENT OR DATA PORT IN THE CLUSTER. IT CANNOT FAIL OVER TO CLUSTER OR INTERCLUSTER PORTS.
Node-management LIF – THE NODE-MANAGEMENT LIF CAN FAIL OVER TO OTHER DATA OR NODE-MANAGEMENT PORTS ON THE SAME NODE.
Answer: A B C
0
0
J R Hartleysays:
It specifies *between nodes*
0
0
shaneusays:
“A” is not correct because SAN LIFs do NOT fail over.
So B & C is correct.
0
0
Michelesays:
C is wrong because the question speaks of the ability to migrate between nodes, not between different ports of the same node.
So, B & C is correct.
0
0
Pawansays:
At first you say C is wrong and in the end you say B & C are correct answers?
Data LIF – THESE INTERFACES CAN MIGRATE OR FAIL OVER THROUGHOUT THE CLUSTER.
Cluster-management LIF – THE LIF CAN FAIL OVER TO ANY NODE-MANAGEMENT OR DATA PORT IN THE CLUSTER. IT CANNOT FAIL OVER TO CLUSTER OR INTERCLUSTER PORTS.
Node-management LIF – THE NODE-MANAGEMENT LIF CAN FAIL OVER TO OTHER DATA OR NODE-MANAGEMENT PORTS ON THE SAME NODE.
Answer: A B C
0
0
It specifies *between nodes*
0
0
“A” is not correct because SAN LIFs do NOT fail over.
So B & C is correct.
0
0
C is wrong because the question speaks of the ability to migrate between nodes, not between different ports of the same node.
So, B & C is correct.
0
0
At first you say C is wrong and in the end you say B & C are correct answers?
0
0
OPS… Sorry, I was referring to D. 🙂
0
0
SAN LIFs do NOT FAIL OVER – ever 😉
0
0