Refer to the exhibit.
The exhibit shows the output of debug isdn q931. An inbound PSTN call was recieved by an MGCP gateway that is registered with a Cisco Unified Communications Manager. The call failed to ring extension 3001. If the phone at extension 3001 is registered and reachable through the gateway inbound CSS, which two actions can resolve this issue? (Choose two)
A.
Change the significant digits for inbound calls to 4 in the gateway configuration in Cisco Unified Communications Manager.
B.
Configure the digit strip 4 on the MGCP gateway configuration in Cisco Unified Communications Manager under Incoming Called Party Settings.
C.
Configure a translation pattern in Cisco Unified Communications Manager that can be accessed by the gateway CSS to truncate the called number to four digits.
D.
Configure a called-party transformation CSS on the gateway in Cisco Unified Communications Manager that includes a pattern that transforms the number from ten digits to four digits.
E.
Configure a voice translation profile in the MGCP Cisco IOS gateway with a voice translation rule that truncates the number from ten digits to four digits.
F.
Configure the Cisco command num-exp 2288223001 3001 on the gateway.
We are talking about 2 alternative options, right. they do not certainly need to be done at the same time. I wander though, with MGCP, is it really worth it (or even possibile) applying digit manipulation at the GW?
0
0