Examine the topology and the configuration output. If the show ip bgp summary command was issued from R1, how many prefixes would it have in the State/PfxRcd field?
Exhibit:

Refer to the outputs shown in the exhibit. What could be preventing the R1 router from receiving any prefixes from the R2 BGP neighbor? Exhibit:

Refer to the Exhibit. How can Provider B move to AS 601 without forcing Certkiller A to immediately reconfigure?
Exhibit:

Refer to the exhibit. All routers are running BGP. Which of these statements is correct?
Exhibit:

Based on the R1 router BGP configuration shown, which three statements are correct? (Choose three.)
Exhibit:

Exhibit

Based on the output of the show ip route bgp command and the BGP configuration shown in the exhibit, which BGP prefixes will be advertised by Certkiller ? Select four.

Given the following configurations, CK2 and CK3 are not able to successfully establish the IBGP session using the loopback 0 interfaces. What could be the cause of this problem?
!!
output omitted
!
hostname CK2
!
interface loopback 0
ip address 2.2.2.2
!
interface e0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
!
interface e1
ip address 10.2.2.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
!
router bgp 65101
neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 65100
neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 65101
!
router eigrp 101
network 10.0.0.0
network 2.0.0.0
!!!
output omitted
!
hostname CK3
!
interface loopback 0
ip address 3.3.3.3
!
interface e0
ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
no shut
!
interface e1
ip address 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
no shut
!
router bgp 65101
neighbor 192.168.1.1 remote-as 65102
neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 65101
!
router eigrp 101
network 10.0.0.0
network 3.0.0.0
!
Exhibit:

You work as a network engineer at Domain.com. You are troubleshooting a BGP neighbor relationship in which the neighbor relationship has gone down. You issue the following command:
show ip bgp summary
You see the string "PfxCt" and Idle appear in the State/PfxRcd field.
What could be the cause of this issue?

Which BGP path attribute is used to inform the BGP peer that the routing information that was presented in the original routing updates may have been lost when the updates were summarized?

sanfran#show ip bgp 172.31.1.0
BGP routing table entry for 172.31.1.0/24, version 15 Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IF-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers:
10.1.0.2 10.200.200.3 10.200.200.4 172.31.11.1
65100
172.31.1.1 from 10.1.0.2 (10.200.200.2)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal 65100
172.31.1.1 from 172.31.1.1 (172.31.1.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best Based on the output shown in the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two)