What should you create in contoso.com?
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 2
Contoso Ltd
Overview
General Overview
Contoso, Ltd., is a scientific research and supply company that has offices along the east
coast of North America. The company recently completed an upgrade to Exchange Server
2013.
Physical Locations
The company has three sales offices and a research office. The sales offices are located in
Atlanta, New York, and Montreal. The research office is located in Miami.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named contoso.com. The Miami office has
its own domain named research.contoso.com.
Each office is configured as an Active Directory site. Each site contains two domain
controllers that run Windows Server 2008 R2 x64. All of the FSMO roles for contoso.com are
owned by a domain controller in the New York site. All of the FSMO roles for the
research.contoso.com domain are owned by a domain controller in the Miami site.
One domain controller in each site is configured as a global catalog server. All of the domain
controllers are configured as DNS servers.
The functional level of the forest and domains is Windows Server 2008 R2.
Network Infrastructure
All client computers are configured to connect to the DNS servers in their respective office
only.
Contoso.com has a standalone certification authority (CA) on a server that runs Windows
Server 2008 R2.
All offices connect to the New York office by using a high-speed WAN link.
Email Infrastructure
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the New York office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
All external access for the contoso.com organization is provided through an Internet link at
the New York office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round robin. All inbound and
outbound email for the domain is routed through a mail appliance in the New York office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the Atlanta office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
The file share witness for NY-DAG is on a file server in the Atlanta office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains two servers in the Montreal office and two
servers in the Miami office. The servers are configured as shown the following table.
All external access to the organization of the research.contoso.com domain is provided
through the Internet link at the Miami office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round
robin. All inbound and outbound email for the domain goes through an email appliance in
the Miami office.
All Exchange Server 2013 servers run Windows Server 2012 Standard.
All users have Windows Phone devices that connect to the Exchange organization by using
Exchange ActiveSync.
User Issues
You discover the following user issues:
• Some users report that, intermittently, they fail to connect to their email from their
Windows Phone device.
• Some users from the New York office report that some searches from Outlook Web
App return incomplete results.
• Some of the users in each office report that they fail to access their mailbox during
the maintenance period of the Active Directory domain controllers.
You verify that all of the remote users can connect to the network successfully by using a
VPN connection, and can then launch Outlook successfully.
Partnerships
Contoso recently entered into a partnership with a company named A. Datum Corporation.
A Datum has a main office and four branch offices. The main office is located in Toronto.
A Datum has a messaging infrastructure configured as shown in the following table.
Requirements
Planned Changes
Contoso plans to deploy a hardware load balancer in the New York office. The load balancer
must bridge all SSL connections to the Exchange servers.
You plan to deploy two new Exchange Server 2013 servers in a virtual server environment in
the Miami office. The servers will host a few mailboxes as part of an evaluation of resource
utilization for virtualized Exchange servers.
You also plan to deploy a high availability solution for Mailbox servers in the
You plan to replace the email appliance in New York because of recent power outages.
Business Requirements
Contoso identifies the following business requirements:
• Minimize the hardware costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize the software costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Mailbox server.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Client Access server.
###EndCaseStudy###
You need to ensure that all of the email messages sent from the Internet to adatum.com are routed
through the contoso.com organization. What should you create in contoso.com? (Each corrects
answer presents part of the solution. Choose all that apply.)
Which two actions should you perform?
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 2
Contoso Ltd
Overview
General Overview
Contoso, Ltd., is a scientific research and supply company that has offices along the east
coast of North America. The company recently completed an upgrade to Exchange Server
2013.
Physical Locations
The company has three sales offices and a research office. The sales offices are located in
Atlanta, New York, and Montreal. The research office is located in Miami.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named contoso.com. The Miami office has
its own domain named research.contoso.com.
Each office is configured as an Active Directory site. Each site contains two domain
controllers that run Windows Server 2008 R2 x64. All of the FSMO roles for contoso.com are
owned by a domain controller in the New York site. All of the FSMO roles for the
research.contoso.com domain are owned by a domain controller in the Miami site.
One domain controller in each site is configured as a global catalog server. All of the domain
controllers are configured as DNS servers.
The functional level of the forest and domains is Windows Server 2008 R2.
Network Infrastructure
All client computers are configured to connect to the DNS servers in their respective office
only.
Contoso.com has a standalone certification authority (CA) on a server that runs Windows
Server 2008 R2.
All offices connect to the New York office by using a high-speed WAN link.
Email Infrastructure
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the New York office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
All external access for the contoso.com organization is provided through an Internet link at
the New York office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round robin. All inbound and
outbound email for the domain is routed through a mail appliance in the New York office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the Atlanta office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
The file share witness for NY-DAG is on a file server in the Atlanta office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains two servers in the Montreal office and two
servers in the Miami office. The servers are configured as shown the following table.
All external access to the organization of the research.contoso.com domain is provided
through the Internet link at the Miami office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round
robin. All inbound and outbound email for the domain goes through an email appliance in
the Miami office.
All Exchange Server 2013 servers run Windows Server 2012 Standard.
All users have Windows Phone devices that connect to the Exchange organization by using
Exchange ActiveSync.
User Issues
You discover the following user issues:
• Some users report that, intermittently, they fail to connect to their email from their
Windows Phone device.
• Some users from the New York office report that some searches from Outlook Web
App return incomplete results.
• Some of the users in each office report that they fail to access their mailbox during
the maintenance period of the Active Directory domain controllers.
You verify that all of the remote users can connect to the network successfully by using a
VPN connection, and can then launch Outlook successfully.
Partnerships
Contoso recently entered into a partnership with a company named A. Datum Corporation.
A Datum has a main office and four branch offices. The main office is located in Toronto.
A Datum has a messaging infrastructure configured as shown in the following table.
Requirements
Planned Changes
Contoso plans to deploy a hardware load balancer in the New York office. The load balancer
must bridge all SSL connections to the Exchange servers.
You plan to deploy two new Exchange Server 2013 servers in a virtual server environment in
the Miami office. The servers will host a few mailboxes as part of an evaluation of resource
utilization for virtualized Exchange servers.
You also plan to deploy a high availability solution for Mailbox servers in the
You plan to replace the email appliance in New York because of recent power outages.
Business Requirements
Contoso identifies the following business requirements:
• Minimize the hardware costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize the software costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Mailbox server.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Client Access server.
###EndCaseStudy###
You need to prevent several users in the Miami office from establishing more than two concurrent
Exchange ActiveSync connections to the Exchange Server organization. The solution must affect only
the users in the Miami office. Which two actions should you perform? (Each correct answer presents
part of the solution. Choose two.)
What are three possible ways to achieve the goal?
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 2
Contoso Ltd
Overview
General Overview
Contoso, Ltd., is a scientific research and supply company that has offices along the east
coast of North America. The company recently completed an upgrade to Exchange Server
2013.
Physical Locations
The company has three sales offices and a research office. The sales offices are located in
Atlanta, New York, and Montreal. The research office is located in Miami.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named contoso.com. The Miami office has
its own domain named research.contoso.com.
Each office is configured as an Active Directory site. Each site contains two domain
controllers that run Windows Server 2008 R2 x64. All of the FSMO roles for contoso.com are
owned by a domain controller in the New York site. All of the FSMO roles for the
research.contoso.com domain are owned by a domain controller in the Miami site.
One domain controller in each site is configured as a global catalog server. All of the domain
controllers are configured as DNS servers.
The functional level of the forest and domains is Windows Server 2008 R2.
Network Infrastructure
All client computers are configured to connect to the DNS servers in their respective office
only.
Contoso.com has a standalone certification authority (CA) on a server that runs Windows
Server 2008 R2.
All offices connect to the New York office by using a high-speed WAN link.
Email Infrastructure
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the New York office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
All external access for the contoso.com organization is provided through an Internet link at
the New York office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round robin. All inbound and
outbound email for the domain is routed through a mail appliance in the New York office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the Atlanta office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
The file share witness for NY-DAG is on a file server in the Atlanta office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains two servers in the Montreal office and two
servers in the Miami office. The servers are configured as shown the following table.
All external access to the organization of the research.contoso.com domain is provided
through the Internet link at the Miami office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round
robin. All inbound and outbound email for the domain goes through an email appliance in
the Miami office.
All Exchange Server 2013 servers run Windows Server 2012 Standard.
All users have Windows Phone devices that connect to the Exchange organization by using
Exchange ActiveSync.
User Issues
You discover the following user issues:
• Some users report that, intermittently, they fail to connect to their email from their
Windows Phone device.
• Some users from the New York office report that some searches from Outlook Web
App return incomplete results.
• Some of the users in each office report that they fail to access their mailbox during
the maintenance period of the Active Directory domain controllers.
You verify that all of the remote users can connect to the network successfully by using a
VPN connection, and can then launch Outlook successfully.
Partnerships
Contoso recently entered into a partnership with a company named A. Datum Corporation.
A Datum has a main office and four branch offices. The main office is located in Toronto.
A Datum has a messaging infrastructure configured as shown in the following table.
Requirements
Planned Changes
Contoso plans to deploy a hardware load balancer in the New York office. The load balancer
must bridge all SSL connections to the Exchange servers.
You plan to deploy two new Exchange Server 2013 servers in a virtual server environment in
the Miami office. The servers will host a few mailboxes as part of an evaluation of resource
utilization for virtualized Exchange servers.
You also plan to deploy a high availability solution for Mailbox servers in the
You plan to replace the email appliance in New York because of recent power outages.
Business Requirements
Contoso identifies the following business requirements:
• Minimize the hardware costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize the software costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Mailbox server.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Client Access server.
###EndCaseStudy###
You need to recommend a temporary solution to reroute all of the outbound email messages
through the Miami mail appliance during the planned replacement of the New York mail appliance.
What are three possible ways to achieve the goal? (Each correct answer presents a complete
solution. Choose three.)
Which DAG design should you deploy?
HOTSPOT
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 2
Contoso Ltd
Overview
General Overview
Contoso, Ltd., is a scientific research and supply company that has offices along the east
coast of North America. The company recently completed an upgrade to Exchange Server
2013.
Physical Locations
The company has three sales offices and a research office. The sales offices are located in
Atlanta, New York, and Montreal. The research office is located in Miami.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named contoso.com. The Miami office has
its own domain named research.contoso.com.
Each office is configured as an Active Directory site. Each site contains two domain
controllers that run Windows Server 2008 R2 x64. All of the FSMO roles for contoso.com are
owned by a domain controller in the New York site. All of the FSMO roles for the
research.contoso.com domain are owned by a domain controller in the Miami site.
One domain controller in each site is configured as a global catalog server. All of the domain
controllers are configured as DNS servers.
The functional level of the forest and domains is Windows Server 2008 R2.
Network Infrastructure
All client computers are configured to connect to the DNS servers in their respective office
only.
Contoso.com has a standalone certification authority (CA) on a server that runs Windows
Server 2008 R2.
All offices connect to the New York office by using a high-speed WAN link.
Email Infrastructure
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the New York office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
All external access for the contoso.com organization is provided through an Internet link at
the New York office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round robin. All inbound and
outbound email for the domain is routed through a mail appliance in the New York office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the Atlanta office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
The file share witness for NY-DAG is on a file server in the Atlanta office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains two servers in the Montreal office and two
servers in the Miami office. The servers are configured as shown the following table.
All external access to the organization of the research.contoso.com domain is provided
through the Internet link at the Miami office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round
robin. All inbound and outbound email for the domain goes through an email appliance in
the Miami office.
All Exchange Server 2013 servers run Windows Server 2012 Standard.
All users have Windows Phone devices that connect to the Exchange organization by using
Exchange ActiveSync.
User Issues
You discover the following user issues:
• Some users report that, intermittently, they fail to connect to their email from their
Windows Phone device.
• Some users from the New York office report that some searches from Outlook Web
App return incomplete results.
• Some of the users in each office report that they fail to access their mailbox during
the maintenance period of the Active Directory domain controllers.
You verify that all of the remote users can connect to the network successfully by using a
VPN connection, and can then launch Outlook successfully.
Partnerships
Contoso recently entered into a partnership with a company named A. Datum Corporation.
A Datum has a main office and four branch offices. The main office is located in Toronto.
A Datum has a messaging infrastructure configured as shown in the following table.
Requirements
Planned Changes
Contoso plans to deploy a hardware load balancer in the New York office. The load balancer
must bridge all SSL connections to the Exchange servers.
You plan to deploy two new Exchange Server 2013 servers in a virtual server environment in
the Miami office. The servers will host a few mailboxes as part of an evaluation of resource
utilization for virtualized Exchange servers.
You also plan to deploy a high availability solution for Mailbox servers in the
You plan to replace the email appliance in New York because of recent power outages.
Business Requirements
Contoso identifies the following business requirements:
• Minimize the hardware costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize the software costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Mailbox server.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Client Access server.
###EndCaseStudy###
You are evaluating a DAG design for the New York and Atlanta offices. You need to ensure that all of
the users in the New York and Atlanta offices can access their mailbox if the WAN link fails. Which
DAG design should you deploy?
To answer, select the appropriate DAG design in the answer area.
which node should you install the root CA certificate?
HOTSPOT
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 2
Contoso Ltd
Overview
General Overview
Contoso, Ltd., is a scientific research and supply company that has offices along the east
coast of North America. The company recently completed an upgrade to Exchange Server
2013.
Physical Locations
The company has three sales offices and a research office. The sales offices are located in
Atlanta, New York, and Montreal. The research office is located in Miami.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named contoso.com. The Miami office has
its own domain named research.contoso.com.
Each office is configured as an Active Directory site. Each site contains two domain
controllers that run Windows Server 2008 R2 x64. All of the FSMO roles for contoso.com are
owned by a domain controller in the New York site. All of the FSMO roles for the
research.contoso.com domain are owned by a domain controller in the Miami site.
One domain controller in each site is configured as a global catalog server. All of the domain
controllers are configured as DNS servers.
The functional level of the forest and domains is Windows Server 2008 R2.
Network Infrastructure
All client computers are configured to connect to the DNS servers in their respective office
only.
Contoso.com has a standalone certification authority (CA) on a server that runs Windows
Server 2008 R2.
All offices connect to the New York office by using a high-speed WAN link.
Email Infrastructure
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the New York office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
All external access for the contoso.com organization is provided through an Internet link at
the New York office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round robin. All inbound and
outbound email for the domain is routed through a mail appliance in the New York office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains four servers in the Atlanta office. The
servers are configured as shown in the following table.
The file share witness for NY-DAG is on a file server in the Atlanta office.
The Exchange Server 2013 organization contains two servers in the Montreal office and two
servers in the Miami office. The servers are configured as shown the following table.
All external access to the organization of the research.contoso.com domain is provided
through the Internet link at the Miami office. Load balancing is provided by using DNS round
robin. All inbound and outbound email for the domain goes through an email appliance in
the Miami office.
All Exchange Server 2013 servers run Windows Server 2012 Standard.
All users have Windows Phone devices that connect to the Exchange organization by using
Exchange ActiveSync.
User Issues
You discover the following user issues:
• Some users report that, intermittently, they fail to connect to their email from their
Windows Phone device.
• Some users from the New York office report that some searches from Outlook Web
App return incomplete results.
• Some of the users in each office report that they fail to access their mailbox during
the maintenance period of the Active Directory domain controllers.
You verify that all of the remote users can connect to the network successfully by using a
VPN connection, and can then launch Outlook successfully.
Partnerships
Contoso recently entered into a partnership with a company named A. Datum Corporation.
A Datum has a main office and four branch offices. The main office is located in Toronto.
A Datum has a messaging infrastructure configured as shown in the following table.
Requirements
Planned Changes
Contoso plans to deploy a hardware load balancer in the New York office. The load balancer
must bridge all SSL connections to the Exchange servers.
You plan to deploy two new Exchange Server 2013 servers in a virtual server environment in
the Miami office. The servers will host a few mailboxes as part of an evaluation of resource
utilization for virtualized Exchange servers.
You also plan to deploy a high availability solution for Mailbox servers in the
You plan to replace the email appliance in New York because of recent power outages.
Business Requirements
Contoso identifies the following business requirements:
• Minimize the hardware costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize the software costs required for a load balancing solution.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Mailbox server.
• Minimize user interruptions if a service fails on a Client Access server.
###EndCaseStudy###
You discover that one of the Client Access servers in the New York office does not trust the
standalone CA. You need to ensure that all of the users who have Windows Phone devices can
connect successfully to their mailbox. In which node should you install the root CA certificate?
To answer, select the appropriate node in the answer area.
What should you recommend?
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 3
Litware, Inc
Overview
Litware, Inc., is a manufacturing company located in North America.
The company has a main office and two branch offices. The main office is located in Chicago.
The branch offices are located in Baltimore and Los Angeles.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named litwareinc.com. Each office is
configured as an Active Directory site.
All domain controllers in the Los Angeles office run Windows Server 2008 R2. All domain
controllers in the Chicago office run Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1). All domain
controllers in the Baltimore office run Windows Server 2012.
All of the FSMO roles are located on a domain controller in the Baltimore office. All of the
domain controllers are configured as global catalog servers.
You have a distribution group for each department. The distribution groups contain all of
the users in each respective department.
Network Infrastructure
The servers in each office are configured as shown in the following table.
The Baltimore and Chicago offices have independent Internet connections. Internet
connectivity for the Los Angeles office is provided through Chicago.
Users frequently send large email messages to other users in the company. Recently, you
increased the maximum message size to 50 MB.
Planned Changes
The company plans to deploy a new Exchange Server 2013 infrastructure that will contain
two Clients Access servers and two Mailbox servers in the Chicago office. The servers will be
configured as shown in the following table.
All client connections to the Exchange Server organization will be routed through a
hardware load balancer. The name client.litwareinc.com will point to the virtual IP address
of the hardware load balancer.
Once the transition to Exchange Server 2013 in the Chicago office is complete, all mail flow
to and from the Internet will be managed centrally through that office by using a Send
connector that has the following configurations:
• Connector name: CH-to-Internet
• Address space: *
• Source servers: CH-EX2, CH-EX3
• Cost: 10
###EndCaseStudy###
You need to recommend changes to the network to ensure that you can deploy the planned
Exchange Server 2013 infrastructure. What should you recommend?
Which names should you identify?
HOTSPOT
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 3
Litware, Inc
Overview
Litware, Inc., is a manufacturing company located in North America.
The company has a main office and two branch offices. The main office is located in Chicago.
The branch offices are located in Baltimore and Los Angeles.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named litwareinc.com. Each office is
configured as an Active Directory site.
All domain controllers in the Los Angeles office run Windows Server 2008 R2. All domain
controllers in the Chicago office run Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1). All domain
controllers in the Baltimore office run Windows Server 2012.
All of the FSMO roles are located on a domain controller in the Baltimore office. All of the
domain controllers are configured as global catalog servers.
You have a distribution group for each department. The distribution groups contain all of
the users in each respective department.
Network Infrastructure
The servers in each office are configured as shown in the following table.
The Baltimore and Chicago offices have independent Internet connections. Internet
connectivity for the Los Angeles office is provided through Chicago.
Users frequently send large email messages to other users in the company. Recently, you
increased the maximum message size to 50 MB.
Planned Changes
The company plans to deploy a new Exchange Server 2013 infrastructure that will contain
two Clients Access servers and two Mailbox servers in the Chicago office. The servers will be
configured as shown in the following table.
All client connections to the Exchange Server organization will be routed through a
hardware load balancer. The name client.litwareinc.com will point to the virtual IP address
of the hardware load balancer.
Once the transition to Exchange Server 2013 in the Chicago office is complete, all mail flow
to and from the Internet will be managed centrally through that office by using a Send
connector that has the following configurations:
• Connector name: CH-to-Internet
• Address space: *
• Source servers: CH-EX2, CH-EX3
• Cost: 10
###EndCaseStudy###
You need to identify which names must be used as the URLs of each virtual directory on the planned
Exchange Server 2013 servers. Which names should you identify?
To answer, configure the appropriate name for each server in the answer area.
Which two tasks should you recommend?
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 3
Litware, Inc
Overview
Litware, Inc., is a manufacturing company located in North America.
The company has a main office and two branch offices. The main office is located in Chicago.
The branch offices are located in Baltimore and Los Angeles.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named litwareinc.com. Each office is
configured as an Active Directory site.
All domain controllers in the Los Angeles office run Windows Server 2008 R2. All domain
controllers in the Chicago office run Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1). All domain
controllers in the Baltimore office run Windows Server 2012.
All of the FSMO roles are located on a domain controller in the Baltimore office. All of the
domain controllers are configured as global catalog servers.
You have a distribution group for each department. The distribution groups contain all of
the users in each respective department.
Network Infrastructure
The servers in each office are configured as shown in the following table.
The Baltimore and Chicago offices have independent Internet connections. Internet
connectivity for the Los Angeles office is provided through Chicago.
Users frequently send large email messages to other users in the company. Recently, you
increased the maximum message size to 50 MB.
Planned Changes
The company plans to deploy a new Exchange Server 2013 infrastructure that will contain
two Clients Access servers and two Mailbox servers in the Chicago office. The servers will be
configured as shown in the following table.
All client connections to the Exchange Server organization will be routed through a
hardware load balancer. The name client.litwareinc.com will point to the virtual IP address
of the hardware load balancer.
Once the transition to Exchange Server 2013 in the Chicago office is complete, all mail flow
to and from the Internet will be managed centrally through that office by using a Send
connector that has the following configurations:
• Connector name: CH-to-Internet
• Address space: *
• Source servers: CH-EX2, CH-EX3
• Cost: 10
###EndCaseStudy###
You need to recommend which tasks must be performed to deliver email messages to the Internet if
CH-EX2 and CH-EX3 fail to connect to the Internet. The solution must ensure that all queued email is
sent. Which two tasks should you recommend? (Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
Choose two.)
Which three actions should you perform?
DRAG DROP
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 3
Litware, Inc
Overview
Litware, Inc., is a manufacturing company located in North America.
The company has a main office and two branch offices. The main office is located in Chicago.
The branch offices are located in Baltimore and Los Angeles.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named litwareinc.com. Each office is
configured as an Active Directory site.
All domain controllers in the Los Angeles office run Windows Server 2008 R2. All domain
controllers in the Chicago office run Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1). All domain
controllers in the Baltimore office run Windows Server 2012.
All of the FSMO roles are located on a domain controller in the Baltimore office. All of the
domain controllers are configured as global catalog servers.
You have a distribution group for each department. The distribution groups contain all of
the users in each respective department.
Network Infrastructure
The servers in each office are configured as shown in the following table.
The Baltimore and Chicago offices have independent Internet connections. Internet
connectivity for the Los Angeles office is provided through Chicago.
Users frequently send large email messages to other users in the company. Recently, you
increased the maximum message size to 50 MB.
Planned Changes
The company plans to deploy a new Exchange Server 2013 infrastructure that will contain
two Clients Access servers and two Mailbox servers in the Chicago office. The servers will be
configured as shown in the following table.
All client connections to the Exchange Server organization will be routed through a
hardware load balancer. The name client.litwareinc.com will point to the virtual IP address
of the hardware load balancer.
Once the transition to Exchange Server 2013 in the Chicago office is complete, all mail flow
to and from the Internet will be managed centrally through that office by using a Send
connector that has the following configurations:
• Connector name: CH-to-Internet
• Address space: *
• Source servers: CH-EX2, CH-EX3
• Cost: 10
###EndCaseStudy###
You need to create and configure a hierarchical address book (HAB) named Litware to reflect the
company’s organizational chart. Which three actions should you perform?
To answer, move the three appropriate actions from the list of actions to the answer area and
arrange them in the correct order.
Which tools should you identify?
DRAG DROP
###BeginCaseStudy###
Case Study: 3
Litware, Inc
Overview
Litware, Inc., is a manufacturing company located in North America.
The company has a main office and two branch offices. The main office is located in Chicago.
The branch offices are located in Baltimore and Los Angeles.
Existing Environment
Active Directory Environment
The network contains one Active Directory forest named litwareinc.com. Each office is
configured as an Active Directory site.
All domain controllers in the Los Angeles office run Windows Server 2008 R2. All domain
controllers in the Chicago office run Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1). All domain
controllers in the Baltimore office run Windows Server 2012.
All of the FSMO roles are located on a domain controller in the Baltimore office. All of the
domain controllers are configured as global catalog servers.
You have a distribution group for each department. The distribution groups contain all of
the users in each respective department.
Network Infrastructure
The servers in each office are configured as shown in the following table.
The Baltimore and Chicago offices have independent Internet connections. Internet
connectivity for the Los Angeles office is provided through Chicago.
Users frequently send large email messages to other users in the company. Recently, you
increased the maximum message size to 50 MB.
Planned Changes
The company plans to deploy a new Exchange Server 2013 infrastructure that will contain
two Clients Access servers and two Mailbox servers in the Chicago office. The servers will be
configured as shown in the following table.
All client connections to the Exchange Server organization will be routed through a
hardware load balancer. The name client.litwareinc.com will point to the virtual IP address
of the hardware load balancer.
Once the transition to Exchange Server 2013 in the Chicago office is complete, all mail flow
to and from the Internet will be managed centrally through that office by using a Send
connector that has the following configurations:
• Connector name: CH-to-Internet
• Address space: *
• Source servers: CH-EX2, CH-EX3
• Cost: 10
###EndCaseStudy###
You are planning the upgrade to Exchange Server 2013.
You plan to perform the following tasks:
• Identify the number of email messages sent and received by the users in the current
Exchange Server organization.
• Identify how many IOPS are required to provide adequate access to mailboxes for all of the
users in the planned organization.
• Validate that all of the planned servers will meet the IOPS requirements of the planned
organization.
You need to identify which tool must be used to achieve each task.
Which tools should you identify?
To answer, drag the appropriate tool to the correct task in the answer area. Each tool may be used
once, more than once, or not at all. Additionally, you may need to drag the split bar between panes
or scroll to view content.