What is the most likely cause of this problem?
A customer wants to view data for a specific profile after the successful completion of a Scan job
in IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center V4.2. The message No Data to Display is shown after
selecting the custom profile and generating the report. What is the most likely cause of this
problem?
what can be done to improve efficiency?
If a large amount of sequential prefetching is occurring, what can be done to improve efficiency?
What is the full path on a 32-bit Windows system for finding log files to determine why the installation faile
During the installation of IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center V4.2 (TPC), the Tivoli Integrated
Portal component failed. What is the full path on a 32-bit Windows system for finding log files to
determine why the installation failed?
Which Explain procedure can be used to find the most expensive SQL statement in terms of CPU cost over a perio
Where are the log files located for this failure?
When installing IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center V4.2 (TPC) the installer encounters an
error when installing the TPC database. Where are the log files located for this failure?
What should be done to improve query performance?
A database named TEST was created and two buffer pools named BP_GENERAL and
BP_AUDITING were created as follows:
The majority of the database tables were created in table space TS1, while one large table was
created in table space TS2. A set of triggers thatThe majority of the database tables were created
in table space TS1, while one large table was created in table space TS2. A set of triggers that
would populate the table in table space TS2 each time changes were made to the database were
then defined and the database was put into production.
At first, ad-hoc queries performing random I/O against the table in table space TS2 ran fine, but
performance has gotten worse as the table has gotten larger. What should be done to improve
query performance?
How can this problem be resolved?
In an environment containing DS8000 storage, IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center V4.2 (TPC)
is used to create volumes in the storage. After some time it has been observed that the TPC
topology does not display all the volumes created earlier. How can this problem be resolved?
A storage group named MED_SG was created as follows: CREATE STOGROUP med_sg ON ?db2fs1? ?db2fs2?
A storage group named MED_SG was created as follows: CREATE STOGROUP med_sg ON
?db2fs1? ?db2fs2? ‘/db2fs3’ Then, a table space named TS1 was created in the storage group
and two tables (TAB_A and TAB_B) were created in the TS1 table space. Four months later, a
DBA discovered that 90% of the space that had been allocated to the MED_SG storage group had
been consumed. So, more space was added to the storage group by executing the following
command: ALTER STOGROUP med_sg ADD ?db2fs4? ALTER STOGROUP med_sg ADD
?db2fs4 Shortly afterwards, queries against tables in the TS1 table space began to run slower.
Which statement should be executed to correct the performance problem?
which license must be installed?
A company’s IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center V4.2 Disk Edition has a mixture of DS8000s,
SVCs, and XIVs managed through a native API. Brocade SMI-S agents are used to manage the
fabric connections for these subsystems. If the company wants to generate storage subsystem
and switch performance reports, which license must be installed?
What can be done to improve the performance of a query that joins SALES and DATE_DIM tables (where SALES is a
A query against the system catalog revealed that data for a table named SALES in a partitioned
database is distributed as follows:
What can be done to improve the performance of a query that joins SALES and DATE_DIM tables
(where SALES is a fact table and DATE_DIM is a dimension table) using the DATE_ID column?