Which of the following best describes the problem with share permissions and share points in Windows NT?

A.
Share points must be the same value as the directory that serves the share point

B.
Share points contains permissions; and any file under the share point must possess the 1D0-470
same permissions

C.
Share permissions are exclusive to root directories and files; they do not involve share points, which define user permissions

D.
Share points are set when connection is established, therefore the static nature of file permissions can conflict with share points if they are not set with read and write permissions for everyone.

Explanation:
If we give assign permission to the share point, this permission is applied to all folders and files within that share point. Note: A share point is a share in Windows NT and Windows 2000. The share point allows the resource to be shared across the network When using a file system, such as NTFS, the files and directories also have permissions. The effective permissions of a file or directory access through a share point is the most limiting of both. For example, for a file NTFS says read and write, but the share point permissions says read-only. The effective permission is read-only – the most restrictive. The only way to prevent this type of conflict is set the share point permission to full control, and let the NTFS permissions take precedence.
Incorrect Answers:
A: Share point naming is not dependent on the directory (folder) that the share point is based. You can even have multiple sharepoints on the same directory.
C: Share permissions are not exclusive to root directories, they also restrict subdirectories. Also, devices, such as printers, may be assigned permissions which can conflict with the share permissions for that device.
D: Both share permissions and file permissions are applied. Microsoft recommends using Full permission for everyone and restrict with file permission. This is just a recommendation and doesn’t have to be followed.