You are a network technician at PassGuide.com, study the exhibit carefully. In this EIGRP network, the output of the command show interface for the link between PG-R2 and PG-R5 indicates that the link load varies between 10 and 35. Which K value setting will be used to make sure that this link is not used by EIGRP when the link load reaches 35, but can be used again when the link load drops below 20?

You work as a network technician at Company.com, study the exhibit provided. You are implementing this QoS configuration to improve the bandwidth guarantees for traffic towards two servers, one with the IP address 5.5.5.5 and the other with the IP address 5.5.5.4. Even after the configuration is applied, performance does not seemto improve. Which will be the most likely cause of this problem?

Based on the output provided in the exhibit, to which address or location will the router forward a packet sent to 192.168.32.1?

Based on the exhibit presented. PG-R2 does not have any 10.100.x.x routes in either its routing table or its BGP table. What will you do at PG-R5 to solve this problem?

On the basis of the network provided in the exhibit, all routers are configured to run EIGRP on all links. If the link between PG-R1 and PG-R2 fails, what is the maximum number of queries PG-R3 will receive for 192.168.1.0/24, assuming that all the packets sent during convergence are transmitted once (there are no dropped or retransmitted packets)?

Observe the following exhibit seriously, which path will be preferred by traffic destined to 10.1.3.1 and arriving at PG-R1?

On the basis of the network provided in the exhibit, R3 and R4 are configured to run all connected links in OSPF Area 1. The network administrator is complaining that traffic destined to 192.168.1.0/24 is being routed to R2, even if R2 is not running OSPF. Which would be the cause of this problem?

On the basis of the exhibit provided, assuming that EIGRP is the routing protocol, then at R5, what would be the status of each path to 172.30.1.0/24?

Based on the network displayed in the exhibit, both PG-R1 and PG-R2 are configured as EIGRP stub routers. If the link between PG-R1 and PG-R3 is down, will PG-R3 still be able to reach 192.168.1.0/24, and why or why not?

Observe the following network presented in this exhibit carefully. Assume that all routers are running EIGRP in AS 100 on all connected links. If the link between PG-R3 and PG-R4 is down, how many queries will PG-R5 and PG-R6 receive?