Which two routing interface parameters are supported in OSPF implementations? (Choose
two.)

Refer to the exhibit. A new TAC engineer came to you for advice. A GRE over IPsec tunnel
was configured, but the tunnel is not coming up.
What did the TAC engineer configure incorrectly?

Which two statements about route redistribution when implementing OSPF are true?
(Choose two.)

Refer to the exhibit. The network administrator is trying to configure mutual redistribution
between EIGRP and OSPF. Autosummarization in EIGRP 100 AS is disabled. After adding
OSPF configuration to router B1, the network administrator checked the routing table of
router B2, but none of the EIGRP routes appeared there.
To redistribute the EIGRP AS 100 routes into OSPF, which command should be added, or
edited, on router B1 under router ospf 10?

Refer to the exhibit. Examine the partial configuration and the routing table excerpt. Which
routes would be redistributed into OSPF area 1?
router eigrp 10
network 10.0.0.0
router ospf 100
redistribute eigrp 10 subnets
network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 1
A partial routing table
C 10.10.10.16/28 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0
D 10.10.10.64/26 (90/284160) via 10.10.24.2, 01:54:36,
Ethernet1/0
C 172.16.10.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1

Refer to the exhibit. Which three commands should be used on router B1 to redistribute the
EIGRP AS 10 routes into RIP? (Choose three.)

Refer to the exhibit. Based on the command output, what is one reason why no routes from
the OSPF neighbor 192.168.0.5 are installed in the IP routing table?
R3#show ip ospf neighbor
Neighbor ID Pri State Deat Time Address
Interface
192.168.0.4 1 FULL/DR 00:01:46 116.16.34.4
Serial1/0.1
192.168.0.5 1 FULL/BDR 00:01:46 116.16.35.5
Serial2/0.1
R3#
R3#show ip route ospf
140.140.0.0/32 is subnetted, 3 subnets
O IA 140.140.1.1 (110/65) via 116.16.34.4, 01:21:23,
Serial1/0.1
O IA 140.140.3.1 (110/65) via 116.16.34.4, 01:21:23,
Serial1/0.1
O IA 140.140.2.1 (110/65) via 116.16.34.4, 01:21:23,
Serial1/0.1
192.168.0.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
O IA 192.168.0.4 (110/65) via 116.16.34.4, 01:21:23,
Serial1/0.1

Refer to the exhibit. The partial configuration foran OSPF ASBR and an Area 0 ABR is
shown. Assume the OSPF configurations throughout the network are operable.
Which statement about these configurations is true?
ASBR
router ospf 123
redistribute eigrp 1 route-map eigrp-to-ospf
!
route-map eigrp-to-ospf permit 10
match ip address prefix-list private
set tag 255
route-map eigrp-to-ospf permit 20
!
ip prefix-list private permit 10.0.0.0/8 ge 8 le 30
ip prefix-list private permit 172.16.0.0/11 ge 11 le 30
ip prefix-list private permit 192.168.0.0/16 ge 16 le 30
Area 0 ABR
router ospf 123
distribute-list route-map private-filter in
!
route-map private-filter deny 10
match tag 255
route-map private-filter permit 20

Refer to the exhibit. A partial routing configuration is shown. Complete the configuration so
that only the default-network is redistributed fromEIGRP 190 into EIGRP 212. Which ACL
statement completes the configuration correctly?
router eigrp 190
redistribute eigrp 212
network 192.0.0.0 0.0.0.3
!
router eigrp 212
redistribute eigrp 190
route-map default-route
network 212.50.185.96 0.0.0.31
!
route-map default_route permit 10
match ip address 100

Refer to the exhibit. Based upon the configuration,you need to understand why the policy
routing match counts are not increasing.
Which would be the first logical step to take? Select the best response.
R1#show route-map divert
route-map dirvert, permit, sequence 1
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): 101
Set clauses:
ip next-hop 212.50.185.126
ip next-hop recursive 192.0.0.1
ip default next-hop 212.50.185.125
Policy routing matches: 0 packets. 0 bytes