Refer to the exhibit. On all routers in the network, EIGRP has been configured for load
balancing across the three links. However, traffic destined for Network B from R1 is only
load balanced over paths R1-R2-R5 and R1-R3-R5. What is the cause of the problem?

hostname R1
!
router eigrp 4
network 10.0.0.0
variance 3

Refer to the exhibit. EIGRP is configured on all routers in the network. On a basis of the
show ip eigrp topology output provided, what conclusion can be derived? Select the best
response.
R1#show ip eigrp topology
<output omitted>
P 10.1.2.0/24 1 seccussors, FD is 281600 via Connected,
FastEthernet0/0
A 10.6.1.0/24 0 seccussors, FD is 3385160704, Q 1 replies,
active 00:00:41, query-origin: Local origin
Remaining replies:
via 10.1.2.1, r. FastEthernet0/0

During BGP configuration on a router that has peered with other BGP speakers, the BGP
command aggregate-address 172.32.0.0 255.255.252.0 is issued. However, the peers do
not receive this aggregate network in BGP advertisements. Also, the router does not have
this aggregate network in its BGP table.
Which option indicates a possible reason this command did not cause the router to
advertise the aggregate network to its peers? Select the best response.

What two situations could require the use of multiple routing protocols? (Choose two)

Refer to the exhibit. Router RT-1 and router RT-2 both advertise network 131.25.0.0/16 to
router RT-3 via internal BGP. What is the reason that router RT-3 chose router RT-1 as its
best path to network 131.25.0.0/16.

RT-1# show ip bgp 131.25.0.0
BGP routing table entry for 131.25.0.0/16 version 14
Paths: (2 available, best#2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
5005 7007 31250
165.105.254.2 (meteric 782) from 165.105.2.2(165.2.2.2)
Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
3003 6006 31250
165.105.255.2 (meteric 782) from 165.105.11.1(165.1.1.1)
Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal,
best

Using the rules for IPv6 addressing, how can the address
2031:0000:240F:0000:0000:09C0:123A:121B be rewritten? Select the best response.

Refer to the exhibit. Router RT-1 chooses one path to network 198.133.219.0/24. Indicate
the reason Router RT-1 chooses this “best” path.

RT-1# show ip bgp 198.133.219.0
BGP routing table entry for 198.133.219.0/24 version 75
Paths: (2 available, best#1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Advertised to update-groups
!
5005 7007 31250
128.107.254.2 (meteric 782) from 128.107.2.2(127.107.2.2)
Origin IGP, metric 2100, localpref 100, valid. internal, best
3003 6006 31250
128.107.255.2 from 128.107.255.2(128.107.0.3)
Origin incomplete, metric 2500, localpref 100, valid, external

How is authentication handled with OSPFv3? Select the best response.

A router has two paths to reach another network in a different autonomous system. Neither
route was generated by the local router and both routes have the same default weight and
local preference values.
Which statement is true about how BGP would select the best path? Select the best
response.

Refer to the exhibit. On the basis of the configuration that is provided, how would the BGP
updates that come from router R1 be replicated inside autonomous system 65200?