Exhibit:

Which two configuration commands will complete the BGP configuration on Certkiller 1 so it will conditionally announce the 172.0.0.0/8 to Certkiller 4 via BGP? (Choose two) hostname Certkiller 1
!
!output omitted
!
1. _____________________
!
router bgp 65001
neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 65001
neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 65001
neighbor 4.4.4.4 remote-as 387
!
2. ____________________
!

Network topology exhibit

What can prevent the corresponding BGP session from being successfully established?

Exhibit:
Certkiller router#show ip route
Codes: C – connected, S – static, I – IGRP, R – RIP, M – mobile, B – BGP
D – EIGRP, EX – EIGRP external, O – OSPF, IA – OSPF inter area
N1 – OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 – OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 – OSPF external type 1, E2 – OSPF external type 2, EEGP i – IS-IS, L1 – IS-IS level-1, L2 – IS-IS level-2, * -candidate default
U – per-user static route, o – ODR
T – traffic engineered route
Gateway of last resort is not set
172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
B 172.16.10.0 [20/0] via 10.1.1.100, 00:00:24
B 172.16.11.0 [20/0] via 10.1.1.100, 00:00:24
172.26.0.0/28 is subnetted, 3 subnets
B 172.26.1.48 [200/0] via 192.168.1.50, 00:00:31 B 172.26.1.32 [200/0] via 192.168.1.50, 00:00:31 B 172.26.1.16 [200/0] via 192.168.1.50, 00:00:31 10.0.0.0/8 is variable subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks B 10.0.0/8 [20/0] via 10.1.1.100, 00:00:24
C 10.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial3
192.168.1.0/28 is subnetted, 3 subnets
C 192.168.1.32 is directly connected, Serial1
C 192.168.1.48 is directly connected, Serial2
C 192.168.1.16 is directly connected, Serial0
192.168.2.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks B 192.168.2.64/28 [20/0] via 10.1.1.100, 00:00:26

Based on the show ip route output in the exhibit, how can you tell if a BGP route is learned via IBGP or EBGP?

Given the AS-path of (51002 51003) 51001 i from the show ip bgp output, what is the origin?

Based on this configuration, which two peering router neighbor statements are correct? (Choose two.)
router bgp 50001
neighbor 192.168.1.1 remote-as 50001
neighbor 10.1.1.1 remote-as 50002
neighbor 10.1.1.1 local-as 50003
!output omitted

If there is no exact match in the local routing table, what three conditions would result in BGP introducing the classful network 172.0.0.0 with the mask 255.0.0.0 into the BGP table? (Choose three.)

During the autonomous system number migration process, which BGP feature allows a BGP router to act as a router within one autonomous system to some BGP neighbors but also appear to be in another autonomous system to other neighbors?

Which one of these statements regarding intraconfederation EBGP sessions is correct?

Which two of these statements regarding BGP and admin distances are correct? (Choose two.)

What is a difference between using the network command vs. the aggregate-address command to perform route aggregation and summarization?