When implementing MPLS Layer 3 VPNs with customers running OSPF as the CE-PE routing
protocol, the service provider MPLS backbone looks like what to the CE routers?

When implementing MPLS Layer 3 VPNs with customers running OSPF as the CE-PE routing
protocol, which situation will require a sham link to be implemented in the MPLS backbone?

On Cisco IOS and IOS XE Layer 3 MPLS VPN implementations, when redistributing the customer
RIP routes into MP-BGP, the RIP metric is copied into which BGP attribute?

Which option is used as a loop prevention mechanism to support MPLS VPN customers with
multihomed sites?

Refer to the partial Cisco IOS XR PE router configuration exhibit for supporting a Layer 3 MPLS
VPN customer using BGP as the CE-to-PE routing protocol.

The service provider AS number is 64500, the customer AS number is 64501, and the customer
CE router is 10.1.1.1. What is missing in the configuration?

Based on the Cisco IOS XR VRF configuration exhibit,

Which two data flows between the MPLS VPNs will be allowed? (Choose two.)

Refer to the partial Cisco IOS XR PE router VRF configuration exhibit.

To implement a central-service VPN supporting both customer1 and customer2, what will be the
required corresponding VRF configuration on the central-service-server PE router?

Which two statements about implementing a separate MPLS VPN to provide customers Internet
access are correct? (Choose two.)

Which CE-to-PE routing protocol implements the down bit as a loop prevention mechanism?

When you are using OSPF as the CE-to-PE routing protocol in MPLS VPN implementations, an
OSPF route from customerA site 1 in Area 0 will appear as which kind of OSPF route in
customerA site 2, also in Area 0?