What is true about the following configuration?
Router bgp 1234
no bgp default ipv4 unicast
neighbor 10.3.2.1 remote-as 1234
neighbor 10.3.3.1 remote-as 1234
neighbor 10.3.2.1 active
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 10.3.2.1 active
neighbor 10.3.3.1 active

Standard OSPF-BGP redistribution results in OSPF routes that are passing though an MPLS VPN are inserted into the receiving sites rote tables as external routes. This makes stub areas and route summarization hard to implement.
How does an MPLS VPN overcome this problem?

MPLS VPN providers can be vulnerable to denial of service attacks by customers generating too many routes and depletting resources in the PE router. Which are valid methods of combating this possibility?

Which of the following is the simplest approach to take when configuring EBGP between PE and CE routers?

Which two are valid design rules for simple VPN of two PE’s each supporting two CE’s on the same VPN?

Which of the following routes types has to perform a label pop function when forwarding a packet over an MPLS network if PHP is active?

Which of the following types of static routes can be combined to implement packet leaking in an VPN combined with Internet scenario?

What is true about a hub and spoke VPN topology?

In MPLS quality of service what entity is assigned a unique FEC?

What does FEC stand for in respect to MPLS?