What will you do at PG-R5 to solve this problem?
Based on the exhibit presented. PG-R2 does not have any 10.100.x.x routes in either its routing table or its BGP table. What will you do at PG-R5 to solve this problem?
what is the maximum number of queries PG-R3 will receive for 192.168.1.0/24, assuming that all the packets sen
On the basis of the network provided in the exhibit, all routers are configured to run EIGRP on all links. If the link between PG-R1 and PG-R2 fails, what is the maximum number of queries PG-R3 will receive for 192.168.1.0/24, assuming that all the packets sent during convergence are transmitted once (there are no dropped or retransmitted packets)?
Which would be the cause of this problem?
On the basis of the network provided in the exhibit, R3 and R4 are configured to run all connected links in OSPF Area 1. The network administrator is complaining that traffic destined to 192.168.1.0/24 is being routed to R2, even if R2 is not running OSPF. Which would be the cause of this problem?
which path will be preferred by traffic destined to 10.1.3.1 and arriving at PG-R1?
Observe the following exhibit seriously, which path will be preferred by traffic destined to 10.1.3.1 and arriving at PG-R1?
how many queries will PG-R5 and PG-R6 receive?
Observe the following network presented in this exhibit carefully. Assume that all routers are running EIGRP in AS 100 on all connected links. If the link between PG-R3 and PG-R4 is down, how many queries will PG-R5 and PG-R6 receive?
why not?
Based on the network displayed in the exhibit, both PG-R1 and PG-R2 are configured as EIGRP stub routers. If the link between PG-R1 and PG-R3 is down, will PG-R3 still be able to reach 192.168.1.0/24, and why or why not?
what would be the status of each path to 172.30.1.0/24?
On the basis of the exhibit provided, assuming that EIGRP is the routing protocol, then at R5, what would be the status of each path to 172.30.1.0/24?
why 10.1.4.0/24 is not in PG-R1’s routing table?
Look at the following exhibit carefully, there is no route to 10.1.4.0/24 in the local routing table. According to the output of PG-R1 in the exhibit, can you tell me why 10.1.4.0/24 is not in PG-R1’s routing table?
which router will have originated it?
Based on the network provided in the exhibit, in these two areas, all routers are performing OSPF on all interfaces. After examining the OSPF database on PG-R4, do you know which type of LSA will contain 10.1.5.0/24, and which router will have originated it?
What LSAs will PG-R6 have in its local database for 10.1.5.0/24?
On the basis of the network provided in the exhibit, PG-R1 is injecting 10.1.5.0/24 by use of a network statement as a network (type 2) LSA. What LSAs will PG-R6 have in its local database for 10.1.5.0/24?