Will redistributed RIP routes from OSPF Area 2 be allowed in Area 1?
Refer to the exhibit.
Will redistributed RIP routes from OSPF Area 2 be allowed in Area 1?
What is the effect of the distribute-list command in the R1 configuration?
Study this exhibit below carefully.
What is the effect of the distribute-list command in the R1 configuration?
Which three route filtering statements are true?
Which three route filtering statements are true? (Choose three)
What are the effects of this RIP configuration on router RTA?
Router RTA is configured as follows:
RTA (config)#router rip
RTA(config-router)#network 10.0.0.0
RTA(config-router)#distribute-list 44 in interface BRIO
RTA(config-router)#exit
RTA(config)#access-list 44 deny 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255
RTA(config)#access-list 44 permit any
What are the effects of this RIP configuration on router RTA? (Choose two)
Which two statements are correct regarding the routes to be redistributed into OSPF?
Refer to the exhibit.
Which two statements are correct regarding the routes to be redistributed into OSPF?
(Choose two.)
which two types of areas would an area border router (ABR) inject a default route?
Into which two types of areas would an area border router (ABR) inject a default route?
(Choose two.)
What two situations could require the use of multiple routing protocols?
What two situations could require the use of multiple routing protocols? (Choose two)
Why is the 140.140.0.0 network not used as the gateway of last resort even though it is configured first?
R3#show run | include defaultip
default-network 140.140.0.0
ip default-network 130.130.0.0
R3#show ip route | begin Gateway
Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 130.130.0.0
116.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 3 masks
C 116.16.37.0/30 is directly connected, Serial1/0.2
C 116.16.32.0/30 is directly connected, Serial2/0.2
C 116.16.34.0/28 is directly connected, Serial1/0.1
C 116.16.35.0/28 is directly connected, Serial2/0.1
S 116.0.0.0/8 [1/0] via 116.16.34.0
* 140.140.0.0/32 is subnetted, 3 subnets
O 140.140.1.1 [110/65] via 116.16.34.4, 00:14:54, Serial1/0.1
O 140.140.3.1 [110/65] via 116.16.34.4, 00:14:54, Serial1/0.1
O 140.140.2.1 [110/65] via 116.16.34.4, 00:14:54, Serial1/0.1
* 130.130.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
D* 130.130.0.0/16 is a summary, 00:30:04, Null0
C 130.130.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
C 130.130.2.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/1
C 130.130.3.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0
D 150.150.0.0/16 [90/679936] via 116.16.35.5, 00:02:58, Serial2/0.1
Refer to the exhibit. Why is the 140.140.0.0 network not used as the gateway of last resort even
though it is configured first?
How is network layer addressing accomplished in the OSI protocol suite?
How is network layer addressing accomplished in the OSI protocol suite?
which two statements are correct?
Refer to the exhibit.
On the basis of the partial configuration, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)