what two conclusions can be deduced?
Refer to the exhibit.
Based on the running configuration that is shown for interface
FastEthernet0/2, what two conclusions can be deduced? (Choose two.)
how is the traffic coming from Host1 handled?
Refer to the exhibit.
GLBP has been configured on the network. When the interface serial0/0/1 on router R1 goes
down, how is the traffic coming from Host1 handled?
Which two statements are true about this technology?
You need to configure port security on switch R1. Which two statements are true about this
technology? (Select two)
What should be changed in the configuration to fix the problem?
Refer to the exhibit and the partial configuration on routers R1 and R2.
HSRP is configured on the network to provide network redundancy for the IP traffic. The
network administrator noticed that R2 does not become active when the R1 serial0 interface
goes down. What should be changed in the configuration to fix the problem?
What is the problem with this configuration?
Refer to the exhibit.
What is the problem with this configuration?
Which statement about this command is true?
The following command was issued on a router that is being configured as the active HSRP
router.
standby ip 10.2.1.1
Which statement about this command is true?
What would happen if another device is connected to the port after the maximum number of devices has been reac
Refer to the exhibit.
Port security has been configured on the switch port Fa0/5.
What would happen if another device is connected to the port after the maximum number of devices has
been reached, even if one or more of the original MAC addresses are inactive?
What is the most likely cause of this status?
hostname Switch1
interface Vlan10
ip address 172.16.10.32 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
standby 1 ip 172.16.10.110
standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 700
standby 1 preempt
hostname Switch2
interface Vlan10
ip address 172.16.10.33 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
standby 1 ip 172.16.10.110
standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 750
standby 1 priority 110
standby 1 preempt
hostname Switch3
interface Vlan10
ip address 172.16.10.34 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
standby 1 ip 172.16.10.110
standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 750
standby 1 priority 150
standby 1 preempt
Refer to the above. Three switches are configured for HSRP.
Switch1 remains in the HSRP listen state. What is the most likely cause of this status?
Which statement is true about these threats?
The Company is concerned about Layer 2 security threats. Which statement is true about these threats?
What conclusion can you infer from this information?
Three Cisco Catalyst switches have been configured with a first-hop redundancy protocol.
While reviewing some show commands, debug output, and the syslog, you discover the
following information:
Jan 9 08:00:42.623: %STANDBY-6-STATECHANGF. Standby: 49:
Vlan149 state Standby -> Active
Jan 9 08:00:56.011: %STANDBY-6-STATECHANGF. Standby: 49:
Vlan149 state Active -> Speak
Jan 9 08:01:03.011: %STANDBY-6-STATECHANGF. Standby: 49:
Vlan149 state Speak -> Standby
Jan 9 08:01:29.427: %STANDBY-6-STATECHANGF. Standby: 49:
Vlan149 state Standby -> Active
Jan 9 08:01:36.808: %STANDBY-6-STATECHANGF. Standby: 49:
Vlan149 state Active -> Speak
Jan 9 08:01:43.808: %STANDBY-6-STATECHANGF. Standby: 49:
Vlan149 state Speak -> Standby
What conclusion can you infer from this information?