Refer to the exhibit. You would like to guarantee 7 Mb/s for FTP traffic in your LAN, as it seems that peer-to-peer traffic is taking up a large amount of bandwidth. When testing the configuration, you notice that FTP traffic doesn’t reach 7 Mb/s. What is the problem?

Refer to the exhibit. Which switching feature is being tested?

Refer to the exhibit. Router E learned about the PIM RP (designated as 7.7.7.7) from four different sources. Routers A and D advertised the 7.0.0.0 network via EIGRP. Routers B and C advertised the 7.0.0.0 network via OSPF. Considering that all four Ethernet interfaces on router E could potentially lead back to the PIM-RP, when router E receives the first multicast packet down the shared tree, which incoming interface will be used to successfully pass the RPF check?

As a network engineer, you responsibility is to install, configure, operate, and troubleshoot networks. In your company’s network, EIGRP is the routing protocol. You have just discovered that two routers restarted the neighbor relationship. Why? (Select two.)

Refer to the exhibit. Users from the Engineering VLAN complain that every time Business VLAN users have a network connectivity issue, the Engineering VLAN users usually have problems experiencing slow response or network connectivity problems. After troubleshooting, an unauthorized switch 2 was found. This unauthorized switch has been a regular problem, assuming the root bridge function under the spanning-tree domain and causing the

Engineering VLAN to be unstable. Which three of these actions could be suggested to fix the problem?

Refer to the exhibit. In this network, R1 has been configured to advertise a summary route, 192.168.0.0/22, to R2. R2 has been configured to advertise a summary route, 192.168.0.0/21, to R1. Both routers have been configured to remove the discard route (the route to null created when a summary route is configured) by setting the administrative distance of the discard route to 255.
What will happen if R1 receives a packet destined to 192.168.3.1?

Refer to the exhibit. You have noticed that several users in the network are consuming a great deal of bandwidth for the peer-to-peer application Kazaa2. You would like to limit this traffic, and at the same time provide a guaranteed 100 kb/s bandwidth for one of your servers. After applying the configuration in the exhibit, you notice no change in the bandwidth utilization on the serial link; it is still heavily oversubscribing the interface.
What is the cause of this problem?

Refer to the exhibit. Catalyst R is the root bridge for both VLAN 1 and VLAN 2. What is the easiest way to load-share traffic across both trunks and maintain redundancy in case a link fails, without using any type of EtherChannel link-bundling?