what is one configuration step you must make on the gateway object taking part in the route-based VPN?
In Check Point, Domain-based VPN’s take precedence over route-based VPN. If implementing a
route-based VPN, what is one configuration step you must make on the gateway object taking
part in the route-based VPN?
What utility would you use to configure route-based VPNs?
What utility would you use to configure route-based VPNs?
Where do you configure the file user.def to change the encryption domain of the Security Gateway?
Where do you configure the file user.def to change the encryption domain of the Security
Gateway?
which could be BEST used to verify connectivity of this VPN?
Henry is attempting to verify VPN connectivity between two hosts, x and y. Of the following
commands, which could be BEST used to verify connectivity of this VPN?
Which technology is not supported with route-based VPNs?
Which technology is not supported with route-based VPNs?
Which feature is not supported with unnumbered VTI?
Which feature is not supported with unnumbered VTI?
Why is this information missing?
In the gateway object, under topology you select the “Get All Members Interfaces with Topology”
option and your newly configured unnumbered VTIs are not populated. Why is this information
missing?
What operating systems support unnumbered VTIs?
What operating systems support unnumbered VTIs?
Would this clustering technology be supported by your unnumbered VTI’s?
You would like to configure unnumbered VTIs and your environment uses load sharing
clustering. Would this clustering technology be supported by your unnumbered VTI’s?
What is the likely cause of this issue?
You are configuring dynamic routing on Secure Platform, as the administrator you run the
command pro enable and reboot. You are confident that your configuration has been done
correctly. When you check, you find the dynamic routing daemon has not started. What is the
likely cause of this issue?