how could you achieve these requirements?
Your perimeter Security Gateway’s external IP is 200.200.200.3. Your network diagram shows:
RequireD. Allow only network 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.20.0 to go out to the Internet, using
200.200.200.5.
The local network 192.168.1.0/24 needs to use 200.200.200.3 to go out to the Internet.
Assuming you enable all the settings in the NAT page of Global Properties, how could you achieve
these requirements?
What is causing this?
Because of pre-existing design constraints, you set up manual NAT rules for your HTTP server.
However, your FTP server and SMTP server are both using automatic NAT rules. All traffic from
your FTP and SMTP servers are passing through the Security Gateway without a problem, but
traffic from the Web server is dropped on rule 0 because of anti-spoofing settings. What is causing
this?
How many log entries do you see for that connection in SmartView Tracker?
You enable Hide NAT on the network object, 10.1.1.0 behind the Security Gateway’s external
interface. You browse to from host, 10.1.1.10 successfully. You enable a log on the rule that
allows 10.1.1.0 to exit the network. How many log entries do you see for that connection in
SmartView Tracker?
Which of the following statements BEST describes Check Point’s Hide Network Address Translation method?
Which of the following statements BEST describes Check Point’s Hide Network Address
Translation method?
Which Check Point address translation method allows an administrator to use fewer ISP-assigned IP addresses th
Which Check Point address translation method allows an administrator to use fewer ISP-assigned
IP addresses than the number of internal hosts requiring Internet connectivity?
which of the following objects?
NAT can NOT be configured on which of the following objects?
Which Check Point address translation method is necessary if you want to connect from a host on the Internet v
Which Check Point address translation method is necessary if you want to connect from a host on
the Internet via HTTP to a server with a reserved (RFC 1918) IP address on your DMZ?
What is an alternative configuration if proxy ARP cannot be used on your Security Gateway?
You want to implement Static Destination NAT in order to provide external, Internet users access
to an internal Web Server that has a reserved (RFC 1918) IP address. You have an unused valid
IP address on the network between your Security Gateway and ISP router. You control the router
that sits between the firewall external interface and the Internet.
What is an alternative configuration if proxy ARP cannot be used on your Security Gateway?
Which of the following is the MOST LIKELY cause?
After implementing Static Address Translation to allow Internet traffic to an internal Web Server on
your DMZ, you notice that any NATed connections to that machine are being dropped by antispoofing protections. Which of the following is the MOST LIKELY cause?
Which NAT option applicable for Automatic NAT applies to Manual NAT as well?
Which NAT option applicable for Automatic NAT applies to Manual NAT as well?