###BeginCaseStudy###
Scenario: 4
V2
Test Management Tool
The project situation after 11 months is:
– The first increment was released one week late but contained sufficient functionality to be
declared fit for purpose’. However, there were 20 outstanding incidents deferred to
increment two.
– The amount of voluntary overtime worked PV the test team has reduced the second
Increment slippage to just 3 weeks.
– There is talk of reducing the scope of requirements. The purpose of this is to first deliver
the application with support for manual testing and then to provide a delivery * weeks later to
resolve any remaining points and provide support for automated testing (i.e. the link to the
capture-replay tool).
– Concerns have been expressed by a section of the user community, that in some places
the usability is very poor.
###EndCaseStudy###

Which of the following would you expect to see in the master test plan?

A.
A description of how the test cases are cross-referenced to requirements in the test
management tool.

B.
A detailed identification of the resources that will carry out structural testing in the first
iteration.

C.
The test approach that will be applied at system integration testing.

D.
A list of the names of the testers who will carry out the performance testing for the final
iteration.