Which two networks does the SW1 device have feasible successors for? (choose two)
A. 172.29.1.0/24
B. 10.19.0.0/24
C. 172.29.0.0/30
D. 172.29.2.0/24
3 Comments on “Which two networks does the SW1 device have feasible successors for?”
Mareksays:
172.29.0.0/30 is the only route where RD < FD
In 10.19.0.0/24 RD = FD therefore this route cannot become a feasible successor, and we can see it only because "all-links" in a topology command
0
0
Pingsays:
In 10.19.0.0/24
RD = 156160
FD = 155160
So 10.19.0.0/24 is FS too.
The number’s very similar.
172.29.0.0/30 is the only route where RD < FD
In 10.19.0.0/24 RD = FD therefore this route cannot become a feasible successor, and we can see it only because "all-links" in a topology command
0
0
In 10.19.0.0/24
RD = 156160
FD = 155160
So 10.19.0.0/24 is FS too.
The number’s very similar.
0
0
sorry i swap value.
FD = 156160
RD = 155160
0
0