Which BGP attribute can be modified to solve this network reachability issue in this type of scenario?
A network engineer is having trouble overcoming a BGP rule: “an EBGP neighbor address
information is carried in the IBGP advertisement. This information does not change to the local
ASBR address”. Which BGP attribute can be modified to solve this network reachability issue in
this type of scenario?
What is the most likely cause of this issue?
The SP core supports PIM-SM for multicast traffic, but one of these routers is not able to see one
of its PIM neighbors. What is the most likely cause of this issue?
how will R1 handle that traffic?
What can the network architect do to satisfy this requirement?
A network architect is tasked to design and deploy multicast in a service provider core. There is a
requirement to have two PIM RP routers for PIM-SM distribute mode. What can the network
architect do to satisfy this requirement?
Which three of these options can be a forwarding equivalence class?
Which three of these options can be a forwarding equivalence class? (Choose three.)
Which two statements best describe the functionality of the BGP graceful restart capability?
Which two statements best describe the functionality of the BGP graceful restart capability?
(Choose two.)
why was subnet 33.33.33.33/32 not received on the R2 BGP table?
Why is the label for 1.1.1.1 prefix absent in the R2’s MPLS forwarding table?
Which the two actions could resolve the issue based on this scenario?
A network engineer is redistributing BGP prefixes into RIP. These prefixes are unreachable in the
RIP network. Which the two actions could resolve the issue based on this scenario? (Choose two.)
Which are the three mandatory BGP attributes?
Which are the three mandatory BGP attributes? (Choose three.)