You are designing a Windows Azure application that will use Windows Azure Table storage. You need to
recommend an approach for minimizing storage costs.What should you recommend?
A.
Use Entity Group Transactions.
B.
Use multiple partitions to store data.
C.
Use a transaction scope to group all storage operations.
D.
Use Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MSDTC).
I am horrible at all this sql db and table storage.
Anyone have suggested links to learn from?
Thanks.
0
0
I think this is not 70-533 question.
0
1
Me too Jhon. I watched videos on pluralsight and youtube but i feel lost still.
0
0
pretty sure its from the DBA exam of same learning path…
0
0
Doesn’t seem like a 70-533 question agreed. However it does appear A is correct.
Entity group transactions improve throughput since they reduce the number of individual storage operations that must be submitted to the Azure Table service. They also provide an economic benefit since an entity group transaction is billed as a single storage operation regardless of how many storage operations it contains.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/Designing-a-Scalable-Partitioning-Strategy-for-Azure-Table-Storage?redirectedfrom=MSDN#uyi
1
0
By the way, SOME new 243Q 70-533 dumps for your reference:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-ob6L_QjGLpfnV3MVl6X3pXOWw1Z3YtQUpJRVRiTkNkbGNFbVBNRXhjSkw3bWk1WHdYcW8
Best Regards!
0
0
Entity group transactions improve throughput since they reduce the number of individual storage operations that must be submitted to the Azure Table service. They also provide an economic benefit since an entity group transaction is billed as a single storage operation regardless of how many storage operations it contains.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/Designing-a-Scalable-Partitioning-Strategy-for-Azure-Table-Storage?redirectedfrom=MSDN#entity-group-transactions
0
0