PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing multiple SharePoint 2010 features. You have the following requirements:
There must be three features, named Feature_1, Feature_2, and Feature_3.
.Feature_1 must be dependent on Feature_2; Feature_2 must be dependent on Feature_3.
.Feature_1 must be available to a site collection named Finance.
You need to ensure that your feature design meets these requirements and follows the SharePoint Feature Activation Dependency Rules.
Which approach should you recommend?

PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

A.
Design Feature_1 and Feature_2 as visible; design Feature_3 as a hidden feature.
Set the scopes for Feature_1, Feature_2, and Feature_3 to Site.

B.
Design Feature_1 and Feature_2 as visible; design Feature_3 as a hidden feature.
Set the scopes for Feature_1 and Feature_2 to Site.
Set the scope for Feature_3 to Web.

C.
Design Feature_1 and Feature_2 as visible; design Feature_3 as a hidden feature.
Set the scope for Feature_1 to Web Application.
Set the scopes for Feature_2 and Feature_3 to Web.

D.
Design Feature_1, Feature_2, and Feature_3 as visible features.
Set the scopes for Feature_1 and Feature_2 to Site.
Set the scope for Feature_3 to Web.

One Comment on “Which approach should you recommend?

  1. Haze says:

    Feature 1 is scope site : “Feature_1 must be available to a site collection named Finance.”

    Feature 1 dependent Feature 2, so scope of Feature 2 is Site.
    Feature 3 dependant Feature 2, so scope of Feature 3 is Site too.




    0



    0

Leave a Reply