Which approach should you recommend?
You are designing a SharePoint 2010 workflow that will be used to monitor invoices. The
workflow has the following requirements: ·Invoices may have a status of Submitted,
Reviewed, Rejected, Returned for Revision, or Approved. .Not every status applies to every
invoice. You need to design the workflow to monitor the status of the invoices as they are
processed. Which approach should you recommend?
Which form should you recommend?
You are designing a custom workflow for a SharePoint 2010 solution. You need to specify
which type of workflow form to use. The requirements for the form are: ·Specify the main
list, library, or content type that the workflow will affect. .Provide a form to display the Add a
New Workflow page. .Provide the form where the administrator can specify settings
common to all workflows, such as the workflow definition and initiation conditions, and
whether the workflow runs on items or folders, or both. You need to specify which type of
workflow form should be used for each phase of the workflow process to meet all these
requirements. Which form should you recommend?
Which approach should you recommend?
You are designing a custom workflow for the Human Resources department. The workflow
will add the business logic for hiring approval to a SharePoint 2010 Web application. The
requirements specify that the workflow must: ·Be used to manage the hiring approvals for
the employee new-hire lists on all department sites. .Encapsulate all of the required
business logic for the approval process. .Make changes to list data that requires higher
privileges than the user initiating the workflow might possess. You need to design the
workflow to meet all these requirements. Which approach should you recommend?
Which scope should you design?
You are designing a SharePoint 2010 application. You need to design a single feature that
includes content types, fields, modules, and list instances. Which scope should you design?
Which scope should you design?
You are designing a SharePoint 2010 application. You need to provision a custom
document converter for the application. Which scope should you design?
Which approach should you recommend?
You are designing a SharePoint 2010 intranet site for your company. Your design needs to
meet the following requirements: ·A SharePoint feature (feature A) must make a custom list
definition available for the entire site collection. .Another SharePoint feature (feature B)
must provision an instance of that custom list definition in the particular site where the
feature is activated. Which approach should you recommend?
Which approach should you recommend?
You are designing a SharePoint 2010 feature that will be included in a solution package.
You have added a feature receiver to your feature. You need to ensure that the code in the
feature receiver executes when the solution package is deployed to the Web front-end
servers. Which approach should you recommend?
Which approach should you recommend?
You are designing a SharePoint 2010 solution that includes a custom site definition and a
custom master page. The solution has the following three features: ·A hidden site-scoped
feature named X that adds the custom master page to the Master Page gallery. .A
Web-scoped feature named Y with a feature receiver that sets the master page of the Web
to the master page from feature X. .A Web-scoped feature named Z with a feature receiver
that populates the default.aspx file with sample content. Any Web site that is created based
on the solution’s custom site definition must have the master page and the sample content
applied to it automatically. Your design must ensure that features X, Y, and Z can be
activated in the proper order. Which approach should you recommend?
Which approach should you recommend?
You have a SharePoint 2010 intranet site with a site collection for all team projects. Each
team project site is created from a custom team project site definition. These sites are
created with a standard list to help manage team projects. Each list can be modified as
needed for each site. You are asked to design two features: ·A feature named X for the list
template .A feature named Y for creating an instance of the list You need to ensure that the
list template is installed before the list instance. Which approach should you recommend?
Which approach should you recommend?
A company with offices worldwide has asked you to design a SharePoint 2010 feature for
an intranet portal. The feature must: ·Be activated only on a site collection. .Contain a
customized list template. .Contain a custom List page. .Use globalized resources that can
be shared with other features. You need to design the feature to support all these
requirements. Which approach should you recommend?