— Exhibit — Click the Exhibit button. A customer is trying to configure a router to peer using
EBGP to a neighbor. As shown in the exhibit, two links are being used for this configuration.
The goal of this configuration is to loadbalance traffic across both EBGP links. Which
configuration accomplishes this goal?
A.
{master:0}[edit] user@router# show protocols bgp group External { multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1; peer-as 65532; neighbor 10.10.2.2; neighbor 10.20.2.2; }
{master:0}[edit] user@router# show routing-options static { route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop
192.168.2.1; } autonomous-system 65432;
B.
{master:0}[edit] user@router# show protocols bgp group External { multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1; peer-as 65532; neighbor 192.168.5.1; } {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options static { route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2
10.20.2.2 ]; } autonomous-system 65432; forwarding-table { export load-balance; }
{master:0}[edit] user@router# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance term
balance { then { load-balance per-packet; accept; } }
C.
{master:0}[edit] user@router# show protocols bgp group External { multi-path;
local-address 192.168.2.1; peer-as 65532; neighbor 192.168.5.1; } {master:0}[edit]
user@router# show routing-options static { route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2
10.20.2.2 ]; } autonomous-system 65432;
D.
{master:0}[edit] user@router# show protocols bgp group External { multipath;
local-address 192.168.2.1; peer-as 65532; neighbor 10.10.2.2; neighbor 10.20.2.2; }
{master:0}[edit] user@router# show routing-options static { route 192.168.5.1/32 next-hop
192.168.2.1; } autonomous-system 65432;