PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

Category: JN0-696 (v.2)

Exam JN0-696: Security Support, Professional (JNCSP-SEC) (update December 13th, 2015)

which configuration change would resolve this problem?

Click the Exhibit button. Your company has a Web server in the trust zone. You configure a
NAT rule to allow Internet users from the untrust zone to access this Web server. Internet
users use the public IP address 70.1.1.1 to access this Web server, but they report that the
server is not accessible. Referring to the exhibit, which configuration change would resolve
this problem?

what is causing this problem?

user@host> show log flow.log Jun 12 20:00:45 host clear-log[ ]: logfile cleared Jun 12

20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:172.23.1.20/2526->10.3.202.56/443;6> matched filter
to_https: … Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:
fe-0/0/6.0:172.23.1.20/2526->10.3.202.56/443, tcp, flag 2 syn … Jun 12 20:01:10
20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:check self-traffic on fe-0/0/6.0, in_tunnel 0x0 … Jun 12 20:01:10
20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:flow_first_rule_dst_xlate: DST xlate: 10.3.202.56(443) to
10.25.0.3(443), rule/pool id 2/2. Jun 12 20:01:10
20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:flow_first_routing: vr_id 0, call flow_route_lookup(): src_ip
172.23.1.20, x_dst_ip 10.25.0.3, in ifp fe-0/0/6.0, out ifp N/A sp 2526, dp 443, ip_proto 6,
tos 0 Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:Doing DESTINATION addr route-lookup
Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: routed (x_dst_ip 10.25.0.3) from managed
(fe-0/0/6.0 in 0) to ge-0/0/1.4093, Next-hop: 10.25.0.3 Jun 12 20:01:10
20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:flow_first_policy_search: policy search from zone managed->
zone trust (0x110,0x9de01bb,0x1bb) Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: app 58,
timeout 1800s, curr ageout 20s Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: permitted by
policy default-policy-00(2) … Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:flow_xlate_pak
Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: post addr xlation: 172.23.1.20->10.25.0.3. Jun
12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: post addr xlation: 172.23.1.20->10.25.0.3. Jun 12
20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:skip pre-frag: is_tunnel_if- 0, is_if_mtu_configured- 0
Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:mbuf 0x42344180, exit nh 0xb00010 Jun 12
20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: —– flow_process_pkt rc 0x0 (fp rc 0) Click the Exhibit
button. You want to allow Web-based management of your SRX Series device through
fe-0/0/6.0. This interface belongs to the managed zone with an IP address of 10.3.202.56.
You are unable to open an HTTPS connection and have enabled traceoptions to
troubleshoot the problem. Referring to the exhibit, what is causing this problem?

Which two actions are required to resolve the problem?

user@R1> show security ike security-associations user@R1> show security zones Security
zone: trust Send reset for non-SYN session TCP packets: Off Policy configurable: Yes
Interfaces bounD. 3 Interfaces: ge-0/0/0.0 ge-0/0/6.0 lo0.0 Security zone: untrust Send reset
for non-SYN session TCP packets: Off Policy configurable: Yes Interfaces bounD. 1
Interfaces: ge-0/0/1.0 Security zone: junos-host Send reset for non-SYN session TCP
packets: Off Policy configurable: Yes Interfaces bounD. 0 Interfaces: user@R1> show
interfaces st0 Physical interface: st0, Enabled, Physical link is Up Interface index: 130,
SNMP ifIndex: 503 Type: Secure-Tunnel, Link-level type: Secure-Tunnel, MTU: 9192
Device flags : Present Running Interface flags: Point-To-Point Input rate : 0 bps (0 pps)
Output rate : 0 bps (0 pps) Logical interface st0.0 (Index 72) (SNMP ifIndex 546) Flags:
Link-Layer-Down Point-To-Point SNMP-Traps Encapsulation: Secure-Tunnel Input packets :
3 Output packets: 3 Security: Zone: Null Protocol inet, MTU: 9192 Flags:
Sendbcast-pkt-to-re Addresses, Flags: Dest-route-down Is-Preferred Is-Primary Destination:
172.19.0.0/30, Local: 172.19.0.1 user@R1> show interfaces ge-0/0/1 Physical interface:
ge-0/0/1, Enabled, Physical link is Up Interface index: 135, SNMP ifIndex: 508 Link-level
type: Ethernet, MTU: 1514, Link-mode: Full-duplex, SpeeD. 1000mbps, BPDU Error: None,
MAC-REWRITE Error: None, Loopback: Disabled, Source filtering: Disabled, Flow control:
Enabled, Auto-negotiation: Enabled, Remote fault: Online Device flags : Present Running
Interface flags: SNMP-Traps Internal: 0x0 Link flags : None CoS queues : 8 supported, 8
maximum usable queues Current address: b0:c6:9a:73:27:81, Hardware address:
b0:c6:9a:73:27:81 Last flapped : 2013-06-12 15:22:48 UTC (00:59:41 ago) Input rate : 0
bps (0 pps) Output rate : 0 bps (0 pps) Active alarms : None Active defects : None Interface
transmit statistics: Disabled Logical interface ge-0/0/1.0 (Index 71) (SNMP ifIndex 541)
Flags: SNMP-Traps 0x0 Encapsulation: ENET2 Input packets : 40 Output packets: 27
Security: Zone: untrust Allowed host-inbound traffic : ping Protocol inet, MTU: 1500 Flags:
Sendbcast-pkt-to-re Addresses, Flags: Is-Preferred Is-Primary Destination: 184.0.15.0/30,
Local: 184.0.15.1, Broadcast: 184.0.15.3 user@R1> show log ipsec-trace | match
“500|drop” Jun 12 16:32:10 16:32:10.680034:CID-0:RT:ageout

71,184.0.15.2/500->184.0.15.1/500,17, (0/0) Jun 12 16:32:51
16:32:51.874191:CID-0:RT:184.0.15.2/500->184.0.15.1/500;17> : Jun 12 16:32:51
16:32:51.874191:CID-0:RT: ge-0/0/1.0:184.0.15.2/500->184.0.15.1/500, udp Jun 12
16:32:51 16:32:51.874191:CID-0:RT: find flow: table 0x4f160b38, hash 8769(0xffff), sa
184.0.15.2, da 184.0.15.1, sp 500, dp 500, proto 17, tok 8 Jun 12 16:32:51
16:32:51.874191:CID-0:RT:pak_for_self : proto 17, dst port 500, action 0x0 Jun 12 16:32:51
16:32:51.874191:CID-0:RT: flow_first_in_dst_nat: in 0/1.0>, out A> dst_adr 184.0.15.1, sp
500, dp 500 Jun 12 16:32:51 16:32:51.874555:CID-0:RT: packet droppeD. for self but not
interested Jun 12 16:32:51 16:32:51.874555:CID-0:RT: packet dropped, packet droppeD.
for self but not interested. Jun 12 16:32:54 16:32:54.680399:CID-0:RT:ageout
71,184.0.15.2/500->184.0.15.1/500,17, (0/0) Jun 12 16:32:56
16:32:56.888094:CID-0:RT:184.0.15.2/500->184.0.15.1/500;17> : Jun 12 16:32:56
16:32:56.888094:CID-0:RT: ge-0/0/1.0:184.0.15.2/500->184.0.15.1/500, udp Jun 12
16:32:56 16:32:56.888094:CID-0:RT: find flow: table 0x4f160b38, hash 8769(0xffff), sa
184.0.15.2, da 184.0.15.1, sp 500, dp 500, proto 17, tok 8 Jun 12 16:32:56
16:32:56.888094:CID-0:RT:pak_for_self : proto 17, dst port 500, action 0x0 Jun 12 16:32:56
16:32:56.888094:CID-0:RT: flow_first_in_dst_nat: in 0/1.0>, out A> dst_adr 184.0.15.1, sp
500, dp 500 Jun 12 16:32:56 16:32:56.888094:CID-0:RT: packet droppeD. for self but not
interested Jun 12 16:32:56 16:32:56.888094:CID-0:RT: packet dropped, packet droppeD.
for self but not interested. Jun 12 16:33:00 16:33:00.680794:CID-0:RT:ageout
71,184.0.15.2/500->184.0.15.1/500,17, (0/0) Jun 12 16:33:07
16:33:06.902220:CID-0:RT:184.0.15.2/500->184.0.15.1/500;17> : Jun 12 16:33:07
16:33:06.902220:CID-0:RT: ge-0/0/1.0:184.0.15.2/500->184.0.15.1/500, udp Jun 12
16:33:07 16:33:06.902220:CID-0:RT: find flow: table 0x4f160b38, hash 8769(0xffff), sa
184.0.15.2, da 184.0.15.1, sp 500, dp 500, proto 17, tok 8 Jun 12 16:33:07
16:33:06.902220:CID-0:RT:pak_for_self : proto 17, dst port 500, action 0x0 Jun 12 16:33:07
16:33:06.902220:CID-0:RT: flow_first_in_dst_nat: in 0/1.0>, out A> dst_adr 184.0.15.1, sp
500, dp 500 Jun 12 16:33:07 16:33:06.902220:CID-0:RT: packet droppeD. for self but not
interested Jun 12 16:33:07 16:33:06.902220:CID-0:RT: packet dropped, packet droppeD.
for self but not interested. You are asked to troubleshoot a new IPsec tunnel that is not
establishing between R1 and R2. The remote team has verified that R2’s configuration is
correct. Which two actions are required to resolve the problem? (Choose two.)

What is the reason for the problem?

user@R1> show log ike-trace Jun 13 07:45:10 ikev2_packet_v1_start: Passing IKE v1.0
packet to IKEv1 library Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_get_s A. Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 –
00000000 00000000 } / 00000000, remote = 184.0.15.2:500 Jun 13 07:45:10
ike_sa_allocate: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 – a1bc3f1d e2a45308 } Jun 13 07:45:10
ike_init_isakmp_sA. Start, remote = 184.0.15.2:500, initiator = 0 Jun 13 07:45:10
ike_decode_packet: Start Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_decode_packet: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe
8a99c1f6 – b8f95b2e f92ca733} / 00000000, nego = -1 Jun 13 07:45:10
ike_decode_payload_sA. Start Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_decode_payload_t: Start, # trans = 1
Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_decode_payload_t: Start, # trans = 1 Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD.
VID[0..16] = afcad713 68a1f1c9 … Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 27bab5dc
01ea0760 … Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 6105c422 e76847e4 … Jun 13
07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 4485152d 18b6bbcd … Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD.
VID[0..16] = cd604643 35df21f8 … Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 90cb8091
3ebb696e … Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 7d9419a6 5310ca6f … Jun 13
07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 4a131c81 07035845 … Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD.
VID[0..28] = 69936922 8741c6d4 … Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_sa_proposal: Start Jun 13
07:45:10 P1 SA payload match failed for sa-cfg to-R2. Abortingnegotiation for tunnel type 2
local:184.0.15.1 remote:184.0.15.2 IKEv1. Jun 13 07:45:10
iked_pm_ike_spd_select_ike_sa failed. rc 1, error_code: No proposal chosen Jun 13

07:45:10 ikev2_fb_spd_select_sa_cB. IKEv2 SA select failed with error No proposal chosen
(neg a7e800) Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_isakmp_sa_reply: Start Jun 13 07:45:10
ike_state_restart_packet: Start, restart packet SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 -b8f95b2e
f92ca733}, nego = -1 Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_sa_proposal: Start Jun 13 07:45:10
ike_st_i_cr: Start Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_cert: Start Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_private:
Start Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_o_sa_values: Start Jun 13 07:45:10 184.0.15.1:500
(Responder) -> 184.0.15.2:500 { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 – b8f95b2e f92ca733 [-1] / 0x00000000
} IP; Error = No proposal chosen (14) Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_alloc_negotiation: Start, SA = {
7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 – b8f95b2e f92ca733} Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_encode_packet: Start, SA = {
0x7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 – b8f95b2e f92ca733 } / b20d590c, nego = 0 Jun 13 07:45:10
ike_send_packet: Start, send SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 – b8f95b2e f92ca733}, nego = 0, dst
= 184.0.15.2:500, routing table id = 0 Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_delete_negotiation: Start, SA = {
7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 – b8f95b2e f92ca733}, nego = 0 Jun 13 07:45:10
ike_free_negotiation_info: Start, nego = 0 Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_free_negotiation: Start, nego
= 0 Jun 13 07:45:10 IKE negotiation fail for local:184.0.15.1, remote:184.0.15.2 IKEv1 with
status: No proposal chosen Jun 13 07:45:10 IKEv1 Error : No proposal chosen Jun 13
07:45:40 P1 SA 3770105 timer expiry. ref cnt 1, timer reason Force delete timer expired (1),
flags 0x330. Jun 13 07:45:40 iked_pm_ike_sa_delete_done_cB. For p1 sa index 3770105,
ref cnt 1, status: Error ok Jun 13 07:45:40 ike_remove_callback: Start, delete SA = {
7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 – b8f95b2e f92ca733}, nego = -1 Jun 13 07:45:40
ike_delete_negotiation: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 – b8f95b2e f92ca733}, nego = -1
Jun 13 07:45:40 ssh_ike_tunnel_table_entry_delete: Deleting tunnel_iD. 0 from IKE tunnel
table Jun 13 07:45:40 ssh_ike_tunnel_table_entry_delete: The tunnel iD. 0 doesn’t exist in
IKE tunnel table Jun 13 07:45:40 ike_sa_delete: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 – b8f95b2e
f92ca733 } Jun 13 07:45:40 ike_free_negotiation_isakmp: Start, nego = -1 Jun 13 07:45:40
ike_free_negotiation: Start, nego = -1 Jun 13 07:45:40 IKE SA delete called for p1 sa
3770105 (ref cnt 1) local:184.0.15.1, remote:184.0.15.2, IKEv1 Jun 13 07:45:40
iked_pm_p1_sa_destroy: p1 sa 3770105 (ref cnt 0), waiting_for_del 0x0 Jun 13 07:45:40
ike_free_sa. Start You are asked to troubleshoot a new IPsec VPN between R1 and R2 that
is not coming up. You have captured the traceoptions output shown in the Above. What is
the reason for the problem?

What is causing the problem?

user@SRX-1> show configuration security ike traceoptions { file ike-trace; flag all; } policy
juniper { proposal-set standard; pre-shared-key ascii-text “$ $ znCO hKMXtuMX – gTz “; ##
SECRET-DATA } gateway juniper { ike-policy juniper; address 192.168.1.11;
external-interface fe-0/0/7; } user@SRX-1> show configuration security ipsec traceoptions {
flag all; } policy juniper { proposal-set standard; } vpn juniper { bind-interface st0.0; ike {
gateway juniper; ipsec-policy juniper; } } user@SRX-1> show security ike
security-associations user@SRX-1> show security ipsec security-associations Total active
tunnels: 0 user@SRX-1> show log ike-trace … Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_st_o_all_done:
MESSAGE: Phase 1 { 0x3f669946 90eba0c7 – 0x76bdffab f8770040 } / 00000000, version
= 1.0, xchg = Identity protect, auth_method = Pre shared keys, Responder, cipher =
3des-cbc, hash = sha1, prf = hmac-sha1, life = 0 kB / 28800 sec, key l Jun 13 16:21:33
192.168.1.10:500 (Responder) -> 192.168.1.11:500 { 3f669946 90eba0c7 -76bdffab
f8770040 [-1] / 0x00000000 } IP; MESSAGE: Phase 1 version = 1.0, auth_method = Pre
shared keys, cipher = 3des-cbc, hash = sha1, prf = hmac-sha1, life = 0 kB / 28800 sec, key
Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_encode_packet: Start, SA = { 0x3f669946 90eba0c7 – 76bdffab
f8770040 } / 00000000, nego = -1 Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_send_packet: Start, send SA = {
3f669946 90eba0c7 – 76bdffab f8770040}, nego = -1, dst = 192.168.1.11:500, routing table
id = 0 Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_send_notify: Connected, SA = { 3f669946 90eba0c7 – 76bdffab
f8770040}, nego = -1 Jun 13 16:21:33 iked_pm_ike_sa_done: local:192.168.1.10,
remote:192.168.1.11 IKEv1 Jun 13 16:21:33 iked_pm_id_validate id NOT matched. Jun 13

16:21:33 P1 SA 3075313 timer expiry. ref cnt 1, timer reason Defer delete timer expired (3),
flags 0x331. Jun 13 16:21:33 iked_pm_ike_sa_delete_notify_done_cB. For p1 sa index
3075313, ref cnt 1, status: Error ok Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_expire_callback: Start, expire SA =
{ 3f669946 90eba0c7 – 76bdffab f8770040}, nego = -1 Jun 13 16:21:33
ike_alloc_negotiation: Start, SA = { 3f669946 90eba0c7 – 76bdffab f8770040} You are
troubleshooting a new IPsec VPN that is not establishing between SRX-1 and a remote end
device. What is causing the problem?

what is causing this problem?

[edit] user@SRX-1# show security ike traceoptions file ike-trace; flag all; [edit]
user@SRX-1# show security ipsec traceoptions flag all; user@SRX-1> show log ike-trace
… Jun 13 17:00:33 :500 (Responder) -> 192.168.1.11:500 { 15276b72 6656c3b6 –
4ea713e7 d2487276 [1] / 0x9828a32e } QM; Invalid protocol_id = 0 Jun 13 17:00:34
Received authenticated notification payload unknown from local:192.168.1.10
remote:192.168.1.11 IKEv1 for P1 SA 3075335 Jun 13 17:00:34
iked_pm_ike_spd_notify_receiveD. Negotiation is already failed. Reason: TS unacceptable.
Jun 13 17:00:34 QM notification `(null)’ (40001) (size 8 bytes) from 192.168.1.11 for
protocol Reserved spi[0…3]=0f f0 ce d3 Jun 13 17:00:34 ike_st_i_private: Start Jun 13
17:00:34 ike_st_o_qm_hash_2: Start Jun 13 17:00:34 ike_st_o_qm_sa_values: Start Jun
13 17:00:34 :500 (Responder) -> 192.168.1.11:500 { 15276b72 6656c3b6 – 4ea713e7
d2487276 [1] / 0x9828a32e } QM; Error = No proposal chosen (14) Jun 13 17:00:34
ike_alloc_negotiation: Start, SA = { 15276b72 6656c3b6 – 4ea713e7 d2487276} Jun 13
17:00:34 ike_encode_packet: Start, SA = { 0x15276b72 6656c3b6 – 4ea713e7 d2487276 } /
65407839, nego = 2 Jun 13 17:00:34 ike_send_packet: Start, send SA = { 15276b72
6656c3b6 – 4ea713e7 d2487276}, nego = 2, dst = 192.168.1.11:500, routing table id = 0
Jun 13 17:00:34 ike_delete_negotiation: Start, SA = { 15276b72 6656c3b6 – 4ea713e7
d2487276}, nego = 2 Jun 13 17:00:34 ike_free_negotiation_info: Start, nego = 2 Jun 13
17:00:34 ike_free_negotiation: Start, nego = 2 Jun 13 17:00:34 IPSec negotiation failed for
SA-CFG Unknown for local:192.168.1.10, remote:192.168.1.11 IKEv1. status: TS
unacceptable Jun 13 17:00:34 P2 ed info: flags 0x0, P2 error: TS unacceptable Jun 13
17:00:34 iked_pm_ipsec_sa_done: Phase2 failed 2/3 times for P1 SA 3075335 The IPsec
tunnel is not establishing between SRX-1 and a remote device. Referring to the exhibit,
what is causing this problem?

What is causing the problem?

user@host> show log ike-test … Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_st_i_cr: Start Jun 13 10:36:52
ike_st_i_cert: Start Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_st_i_private: Start Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_st_o_iD.
Start Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_st_o_hash: Start Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_find_pre_shared_key: Find
pre shared key key for 172.168.100.2:500, id = ipv4(udp:500,[0..3]=172.168.100.2) ->
192.168.101.2:500, id = No Id Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_policy_reply_find_pre_shared_key: Start
Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_calc_maC. Start, initiator = true, local = true Jun 13 10:36:52
ike_st_o_status_n: Start Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_st_o_private: Start Jun 13 10:36:52
ike_policy_reply_private_payload_out: Start Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_st_o_encrypt: Marking
encryption for packet Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_encode_packet: Start, SA = { 0x86b8160b
93a10c7c – c6c3a771 f0475656 } / 00000000, nego = -1 Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_send_packet:
Start, send SA = { 86b8160b 93a10c7c – c6c3a771 f0475656}, nego = -1, src =
172.168.100.2:500, dst = 192.168.101.2:500, routing table id = 0 Jun 13 10:36:52 ike_get_s

which modification is needed under [edit security gateway Partner]?

Click the Exhibit button. You have created a new VPN tunnel to your partner’s site but IKE
Phase 1 is not coming up. You check the trace log and find the following log message: Jun
[IKED 2] iked_pm_id_validate id NOT matched. Considering the topology and the SRX
Series device’s configuration shown in the exhibit, which modification is needed under [edit
security gateway Partner]?

What is causing the problem?

user@host> request services application-identification application copy
junos:AIM-HTTP-API error: Can not commit to junos configure DB.
———————————————————————- could not lock modified database mgd
xcommit failed Copy application junos:AIM-HTTP-API failed. You want to make a custom
copy of the junos: AIM-HTTP-API application signature. However, when you attempt to copy
the application signature, you receive the error shown in the Above. What is causing the

problem?


Page 3 of 41234