PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

Category: JN0-692

Exam JN0-692: Service Provider Routing and Switching Support, Professional

what would cause this problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –ISIS Trace options :
May 21 20:58:25.3 ERROR: interface ae1.12 MTU 1200 is too small
Interface configuration :
user@router# show interfaces ae1.12
vlan-id 12;
family inet {
address 10.1.1.1/24;
}
family iso {
mtu 1200;
}
— Exhibit –An IS-IS adjacency does not come up between two directly connected routers.
Referring to the exhibit, what would cause this problem?

which configuration was used to load-balance traffic across xe-5/2/0 and xe-5/2/1 interfaces?

Refer to the Exhibit.
user@router> show route 100.1.1.0
inet.0: 17 destinations, 19 routes (16 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
100.1.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:08:51, localpref 100
AS path: 65000 I
to 17.3.1.4 via xe-5/2/0.0
> to 17.1.1.1 via xe-5/2/1.0
[BGP/170] 00:08:51, localpref 100
AS path: 65000 I
> to 17.3.1.4 via xe-5/2/0.0
Referring to the exhibit, which configuration was used to load-balance traffic across xe-5/2/0 and
xe-5/2/1 interfaces?

what should you do to resolve this problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.


You have been asked to establish an IPv6 EBGP peering between R1 and a customer’s router.
You have an existing IPv4 EBGP peering to this device. After adding the IPv6 neighbor
configuration to the existing EBGP group configuration, the IPv4 neighborship is down and will not
establish.

Referring to the exhibit, what should you do to resolve this problem?

Which two statements are correct?

Refer to the Exhibit.

Your company (AS 65501) is bringing up a new EBGP peering with a new customer site (AS
65530). Your EBGP peering was preconfigured and the customer has recently configured their
side. The EBGP peering session has failed to establish and you have been asked to review the
information shown in the exhibit to determine the problem.
Which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)

Which two configurations must be added to PE1 to ensure that this traffic is always carried on LSP-1?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –user@PE1# show protocols mpls
userel-switched-path LSP-1 {
from 101.101.101.1;
to 103.103.103.1;
}
userel-switched-path LSP-2 {
from 101.101.101.1;
to 103.103.103.1;
}
interface ge-0/0/0.0;
user@PE1# show protocols ldp
interface lo0.0;
user@PE1# show protocols l2circuit
neighbor 103.103.103.1 {
interface ge-0/0/3.300 {
virtual-circuit-id 300;
}
}
user@PE1# show interfaces ge-0/0/3
flexible-vlan-tagging;

encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
unit 300 {
encapsulation vlan-ccc;
vlan-id 300;
}
user@PE1# show protocols l2circuit
neighbor 103.103.103.1 {
interface ge-0/0/3.300 {
virtual-circuit-id 300;
community test-community;
}
}
user@PE1# show policy-options
community test-community members 300:300;
— Exhibit –Given the topology shown below:
CE1-PE1-P-PE2-CE2
PE1 and PE2 have two equal-cost RSVP LSPs (LSP-1 and LSP-2). They form a Layer 2 circuit
between CE1 and CE2. You are asked to map their traffic to take LSP-1. The exhibit shows the
current configuration of PE1. The correct configuration has been completed on the other routers.
Which two configurations must be added to PE1 to ensure that this traffic is always carried on
LSP-1? (Choose two.)


Page 2 of 612345...Last »