Click the Exhibit button.

Server B is attached to the yellow VLAN. Server C is attached to the pink VLAN. Referring to the
exhibit, which statement is true about server B?

user@qfabric> show route

inet.0: 5 destinations, 5 routes (5 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
1.1.1.1/32 *[Local/0] 3d 18:26:18
Reject
2.2.2.0/24 *[Direct/0] 3d 18:18:56
via NW-NG-0:vlan.2
2.2.2.1/32 *[Local/0] 3d 18:26:18
Local via NW-NG-0:vlan.2
3.3.3.1/32 *[Local/0] 3d 18:26:18
Reject
224.0.0.5/32 *[OSPF/10] 3d 18:26:19, metric 1
MultiRecv
user@qfabric> show vlans
Name Tag Interfaces
default
None
vlan1
None
vlan2
node1:xe-0/0/20.0*, node2:xe-0/0/20.0*
vlan3
node0:xe-0/0/6.0
which two statements are true for hosts on VLANs 1, 2, and 3? (Choose two.)

user@qfabric> show fabric administration inventory director-group status
Director Group Status Mon Jul 30 14:55:51 PDT 2012
Member Status Role Mgmt Address CPU Free Memory VMs Up Time
—— —— ——– ————— — ———– — ————-
dg0 online master 10.210.14.150 8% 9180140k 4 22 days, 03:36 mins
dg1 online backup 10.210.14.151 4% 20966160k 3 2 days, 18:25 hrs
Member Device Id/Alias Status Role
—— —————- ——- ———
dg0 0281022012000012 online master
Master Services
—————
Database Server online
Load Balancer Director online

QFabric Partition Address offline
Director Group Managed Services
——————————-
Shared File System online
Network File System online
Virtual Machine Server online
Load Balancer/DHCP online
which behavior would you see?

[edit interfaces]
user@qfabric# show
LC2:xe-0/0/20 {
mtu 2100;
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members v30-FCoE;
}
native-vlan-id 11;
}}}
You have been informed that FCoE packets are not being passed through the QFabric system. What
is causing the problem?

QFabric system:
LC0:xe-0/0/1 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members all;
}
native-vlan-id 64;
}}}
Switch A:
xe-0/0/1 {
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
port-mode trunk;
vlan {
members all;
}
native-vlan-id 64;
}})

Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, Node device LC0 is connected to switch A on interface xe-0/0/1. Switch A is
not receiving untagged packets from LC0. What is causing the problem?

user@qfabric> show fabric administration inventory
Item Identifier Connection Configuration
Node group
LC1-SNG Connected Configured
LC1 P2399-C Connected
NW-NG-0 Connected Configured

LC0 P1992-C Connected
RSNG Connected Configured
LC2 P4098-C Connected
LC3 P3716-C Connected
Interconnect device
IC-0 IC-P4847-C Connected Configured
P4847-C/RE0 Connected
IC-1 IC-P4881-C Connected Configured
P4881-C/RE0 Connected
Fabric manager
FM-0 Connected Configured
Fabric control
FC-0 Connected Configured
FC-1 Connected Configured
Diagnostic routing engine
DRE-0 Connected Configured
user@qfabric> show Ethernet-switching table
Ethernet-switching table: 44 entries, 10 learned
VLAN MAC address Type Age Interfaces
VLAN100 00:05:33:64:c0:a5 Static – LC0:xe-0/0/32.0
VLAN100 00:05:33:64:c6:a9 Static – LC1:xe-0/0/32.0
VLAN100 0e:fc:00:01:02:09 Static – LC1:xe-0/0/32.0
……
qfabric-admin@FC-0> show route fabric table bgp.bridgevpn.0
bgp.bridgevpn.0: 27 destinations, 54 routes (27 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Restart Complete
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
65534:1:14.0:5:33:64:c0:a5/144
*[BGP/170] 1w4d 01:31:37, localpref 100
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 128.0.128.4 via dcfabric.0, Push 1663, Push 8, Push 49(top)
[BGP/170] 1w4d 01:31:37, localpref 100, from 128.0.128.8
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 128.0.128.4 via dcfabric.0, Push 1663, Push 8, Push 49(top)
65534:1:14.0:5:33:64:c6:a9/144
*[BGP/170] 1w4d 01:36:37, localpref 100
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 128.0.130.18 via dcfabric.0, Push 1683, Push 7, Push 49(top)
[BGP/170] 1w4d 01:36:37, localpref 100, from 128.0.128.8
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 128.0.130.18 via dcfabric.0, Push 1683, Push 7, Push 49(top)
65534:1:14.e:fc:0:1:2:9/144
*[BGP/170] 1w4d 01:36:37, localpref 100
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 128.0.130.18 via dcfabric.0, Push 1683, Push 7, Push 49(top)
[BGP/170] 1w4d 01:36:37, localpref 100, from 128.0.128.8
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 128.0.130.18 via dcfabric.0, Push 1683, Push 7, Push 49(top)

65534:1:14.e:fc:0:1:2:14/144
*[BGP/170] 1w4d 01:31:37, localpref 100
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 128.0.128.4 via dcfabric.0, Push 1663, Push 8, Push 49(top)
[BGP/170] 1w4d 01:31:37, localpref 100, from 128.0.128.8
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 128.0.128.4 via dcfabric.0, Push 1663, Push 8, Push 49(top)
…
qfabric-admin@FC-0> show route advertising-protocol bgp 128.0.130.18 bridge-route-macaddress
00:05:33:64:c0:a5 fabric table bgp.bridgevpn.0
bgp.bridgevpn.0: 26 destinations, 52 routes (26 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Restart Complete
Prefix Nexthop MED Lclpref AS path

Click the Exhibit button.
Host A on the Node device LC1 is not able to connect to Host B on the Node device LC0.The MAC
address of Host A is 00:05:33:64:c6:a9. The MAC address of Host B is 00:05:33:64:c0:a5.
Referring to the exhibit, what is causing this problem?

Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, you have just attached a new switch to the QFabric system and have
enabled OSPF on all NW-NG-0 interfaces. You observe a significant sustained increase in control
plane traffic. What are two possible resolutions for this issue? (Choose two.)

user@qfabric> show fabric administration inventory
Item Identifier Connection Configuration
Ungrouped Node device
P4086-C Disconnected
P4088-C Disconnected
Node group
NW-NG-0 Connected Configured
RSNG-1 Disconnected
Node-2 P4097-C Disconnected
Node-3 P3603-C Disconnected
Interconnect device
IC-P4840-C Connected Configured
P4840-C/RE0 Connected
IC-P4846-C Connected Configured
P4846-C/RE0 Connected

Fabric manager
FM-0 Connected Configured
Fabric control
FC-0 Connected Configured
FC-1 Disconnected
Diagnostic routing engine
DRE-0 Connected Configured

Click the Exhibit button.
Which two statements are true for the system shown in the exhibit? (Choose two.)