which class of service component?
— Exhibit —
…
if-exceeding {
bandwidth-limit 1m;
burst-size-limit 3k;
}
then discard;
— Exhibit —
The configuration in the exhibit is associated with which class of service component?
Which firewall filter configuration do you use?
Referring to the exhibit, you are asked to rate-limit traffic from Web-Server to the subnet where Mal-User is
located. All other traffic should be permitted.
Which firewall filter configuration do you use?
Which firewall filter configuration do you use?
Referring to the exhibit, you want to block HTTP access to Web-Server from the subnet where Mal-User is
located. All other traffic should be permitted.
Which firewall filter configuration do you use?
what is the function of the protect-loopback filter?
— Exhibit —
[edit interfaces]
user@router# show
…
lo0 {
unit 0 {
familyinet {
filter {
input protect-loopback;
}
address 192.168.100.1/32;
}
}
}
— Exhibit —
Given the configuration shown in the exhibit, what is the function of the protect-loopback filter?
which two statements are true?
— Exhibit —
[edit policy-options]
user@router# show
policy-statementpolicyABC {
term A {
from {
protocol rip;
route-filter 192.168.1.0/24 longer;
}
then accept;
}
}
[edit protocols ospf]
user@router# show
exportpolicyABC;
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/0.0;
interface lo0.0;
}
— Exhibit –Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
which routes will be advertised to OSPF neighbors becau…
— Exhibit —
user@router> show route
inet.0: 9 destinations, 9 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
10.10.10.91/32 *[Direct/0] 00:09:40
>via lo0.0
10.10.10.92/32 *[OSPF/10] 00:01:50, metric 1
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
100.100.1.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:01:50
Reject
172.16.1.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:06:09
>via ge-0/0/2.0
172.16.1.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:06:09
Local via ge-0/0/2.0
192.168.0.0/16 *[Aggregate/130] 00:00:06
Reject
192.168.0.0/17 *[Aggregate/130] 00:00:06
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
192.168.50.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:00:06
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
192.168.51.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:00:06
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
user@router> show configuration policy-options
policy-statement demo {term 1 {
from {
protocol aggregate;
route-filter 192.168.0.0/16 longer;
}
then accept;
}
}
user@router> show configuration protocols ospf
export demo;
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/2.0;
}
— Exhibit —
Given the configuration and routing table shown in the exhibit, which routes will be advertised to OSPF
neighbors because of the demo policy?
what will happen to traffic from source 10.10.10.25 des…
— Exhibit —
user@router> show configuration firewall
familyinet {
filter demo {
term example {
from {
source-address {
100.100.100.0/24;
}
destination-address {
200.200.200.0/24;
}
}
then {
reject;
}
}
term testing {
from {
source-address {
10.10.10.0/28;
}
destination-address {
200.200.200.0/24;
}
}
then sample;
}
term results {
from {
address {
200.200.200.0/24;
}
}then accept;
}
term final {
thenpolicer LAPD;
}
}
}
— Exhibit —
Given the configuration shown in the exhibit, what will happen to traffic from source 10.10.10.25 destined to
200.200.200.1?
which routes will be advertised to OSPF neighbors becau…
— Exhibit —
user@router> show route
inet.0: 9 destinations, 9 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
10.10.10.91/32 *[Direct/0] 00:09:40
>via lo0.0
10.10.10.92/32 *[OSPF/10] 00:01:50, metric 1
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
100.100.1.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:01:50
Reject
172.16.1.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:06:09
>via ge-0/0/2.0
172.16.1.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:06:09
Local via ge-0/0/2.0
192.168.0.0/16 *[Aggregate/130] 00:00:06
Reject
192.168.0.0/17 *[Aggregate/130] 00:00:06
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
192.168.50.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:00:06
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
192.168.51.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:00:06
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
user@router> show configuration policy-options
policy-statement demo {
term 1 {
from {
protocol static;
route-filter 192.168.0.0/16 orlonger accept;
}
then accept;
}
}
user@router> show configuration protocols ospfexport demo;
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/2.0;
}
— Exhibit —
Given the configuration and routing table shown in the exhibit, which routes will be advertised to OSPF
neighbors because of the demo policy?
which routes will be advertised to OSPF neighbors becau…
— Exhibit —
user@router> show route
inet.0: 9 destinations, 9 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
10.10.10.91/32 *[Direct/0] 00:09:40
>via lo0.0
10.10.10.92/32 *[OSPF/10] 00:01:50, metric 1
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
100.100.1.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:01:50
Reject
172.16.1.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:06:09
>via ge-0/0/2.0
172.16.1.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:06:09
Local via ge-0/0/2.0
192.168.0.0/16 *[Aggregate/130] 00:00:06
Reject
192.168.0.0/17 *[Aggregate/130] 00:00:06
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
192.168.50.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:00:06
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
192.168.51.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:00:06
>to 172.16.1.2 via ge-0/0/2.0
user@router> show configuration policy-options
policy-statement demo {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 192.168.0.0/16 longer accept;
}
then reject;
}
}
user@router> show configuration protocols ospf
export demo;
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/2.0;}
— Exhibit —
Given the configuration and routing table shown in the exhibit, which routes will be advertised to OSPF
neighbors because of the demo policy?
which statement is correct about traffic matching the r…
— Exhibit —
[edit routing-options]
user@router# show
static {
defaults {
metric 10;
preference 10;
}
route 10.10.10.0/24 {
next-hop 192.168.100.1;
qualified-next-hop 192.168.200.1;
preference 6;
}
metric 8;
}
}
— Exhibit –Given the configuration shown in the exhibit, which statement is correct about traffic matching the route
10.10.10.0/24?