Click the Exhibit button.

You are asked to implement NAT to translate addresses between the IPv4 and IPv6 networks shown in the
exhibit.
What are three configuration requirements? (Choose three.)

Click the Exhibit button.

Host A cannot resolve the www.target.host.com Web page when using its configured DNS server. As shown in
the exhibit, Host A’s configured DNS server and the Web server hosting the www.target.host.com Web page
are in the same subnet. You have verified bidirectional reachability between Host A and the Web server hosting
the Web page.
What would cause this behavior on the SRX device in Company B’s network?

Click the Exhibit button.
— Exhibit —
[edit]
user@srx# run show route
inet.0: 10 destinations, 10 routes (10 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
0.0.0.0/0 *[Static/5] 01:09:08
> to 172.18.1.1 via ge-0/0/3.010.210.14.128/27 *[Direct/0] 8w6d 15:43:09
> via ge-0/0/0.0
10.210.14.135/32 *[Local/0] 11w0d 06:43:04
Local via ge-0/0/0.0
172.18.1.0/30 *[Direct/0] 8w6d 15:43:01
> via ge-0/0/3.0
172.18.1.2/32 *[Local/0] 11w0d 06:43:03
Local via ge-0/0/3.0
172.19.1.0/24 *[Direct/0] 03:46:56
> via ge-0/0/1.0
172.19.1.1/32 *[Local/0] 03:46:56
Local via ge-0/0/1.0
172.20.105.0/24 *[Direct/0] 03:46:56
> via ge-0/0/4.105
172.20.105.1/32 *[Local/0] 03:46:56
Local via ge-0/0/4.105
192.168.30.1/32 *[Direct/0] 4d 03:44:41
> via lo0.0
fbf.inet.0: 2 destinations, 2 routes (2 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
0.0.0.0/0 *[Static/5] 00:00:11
> to 172.19.1.2 via ge-0/0/1.0
172.19.1.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:00:11
> via ge-0/0/1.0
[edit]
user@srx# show routing-instances
fbf {
routing-options {
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 172.19.1.2;
}
}
}
[edit]
user@srx# show routing-options
interface-routes {
rib-group inet fbf-int;
}
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 172.18.1.1;
}
rib-groups {
fbf-int {
import-rib [ inet.0 fbf.inet.0 ];
import-policy fbf-pol;
}
}
[edit]
user@srx# show policy-options policy-statement fbf-pol
term 1 {
from interface ge-0/0/1.0;
to rib fbf.inet.0;
then accept;
}
term 2 {
then reject;}
— Exhibit —
Referring to the exhibit, you notice that filter-based forwarding is not working.
What is the reason for this behavior?

Click the Exhibit button.

In the network shown in the exhibit, you want to forward traffic from the employees to ISP1 and ISP2. You want
to forward all Web traffic to ISP1 and all other traffic to ISP2. However, your configuration is not producing the
expected results. Part of the configuration is shown in the exhibit. When you run the show route table isp1
command, you do not see the default route listed.
What is causing this behavior?

Click the Exhibit button.

In the network shown in the exhibit, you want to forward traffic from the employees to ISP1 and ISP2. You want
to forward all Web traffic to ISP1 and all other traffic to ISP2. While troubleshooting, you change your filter to
forward all traffic to ISP1. However, no traffic is sent to ISP1.
What is causing this behavior?

Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, which feature allows the hosts in the Trust and DMZ zones to route to either ISP, based
on source address?

Click the Exhibit button.

TCP traffic sourced from Host A destined for Host B is being redirected using filter-based forwarding to use the
Red network. However, return traffic from Host B destined for Host A is using the Blue network and getting
dropped by the SRX device.
Which action will resolve the issue?

— Exhibit —
user@srx240< show route summary
Router ID.
inet.0: 3 destinations, 3 routes (3 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Direct: 1 routes, 1 active
Local: 1 routes, 1 active
StatiC. 1 routes, 1 active
customer-A.inet.0: 3 destinations, 3 routes (3 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Direct: 1 routes, 1 active
Local: 1 routes, 1 active
StatiC. 1 routes, 1 active
customer-B.inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Direct: 1 routes, 1 active
Local: 1 routes, 1 activeOSPF. 1 routes, 1 active
StatiC. 1 routes, 1 active
customer-B.inet6.0: 5 destinations, 5 routes (5 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Direct: 2 routes, 2 active
Local: 2 routes, 2 active
StatiC. 1 routes, 1 active
— Exhibit —
In the output, how many user-configured routing instances have active routes?

Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, the application firewall configuration fails to commit. What must you do to allow the
configuration to commit?

Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, the session close log was generated by the application firewall rule set HTTP.
Why did the session close?