PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

Category: Uncategorized

Which two commands should be used to obtain additional …

These log entries can have different root causes:
Jun 28 05:01:21 LTM_A notice mcpd[27545]: 0107143a:5: CMI reconnect timer: enabled
Jun 28 05:01:21 LTM_A notice mcpd[27545]: 01071431:5: Attempting to connect to CMI peer 1.1.1.2 port
6699
Jun 28 05:01:21 LTM_A notice mcpd[27545]: 01071432:5: CMI peer connection established to 1.1.1.2 port
6699
Jun 28 05:01:26 LTM_A notice mcpd[27545]: 0107143a:5: CMI reconnect timer: disabled, all peers are
connected
Which two commands should be used to obtain additional information on these entries? (Choose two.)

How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting a problem on an eCommerce website. The user browses the online
store using port 80, adding items to the shopping cart. The user then clicks the “Checkout” button on the
site, which redirects the user to port 443 for the checkout process. Suddenly, the user’s shopping cart is
shown as empty. The shopping cart data is stored in memory on the server, and the default source address
persistence profile is used on both virtual servers.
How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

What is the issue?

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting a problem on an eCommerce website. The user browses the online
store using port 80, adding items to the shopping cart. The user then clicks the “Checkout” button on the
site, which redirects the user to port 443 for the checkout process. Suddenly, the user’s shopping cart is
shown as empty. The shopping cart data is stored in memory on the server, and the default source address
persistence profile is used on both virtual servers.
What is the issue?

How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue with a new virtual server. When connecting through the
virtual server, clients receive the message “Unable to connect” in the browser, although connections directly
to the pool member show the application is functioning correctly.
The LTM configuration is:
ltm virtual /Common/vs_https {
destination /Common/10.10.1.110:443
ip-protocol udp
mask 255.255.255.255
pool /Common/pool_https
profiles {
/Common/udp { }
}
translate-address enabledtranslate-port enabled
vlans-disabled
}
ltm pool /Common/pool_https {
members {
/Common/172.16.20.1:443 {
address 172.16.20.1
}}}
How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue with a new virtual server. When connecting through the
virtual server, clients receive the message “The connection was reset” in the browser, although connections
directly to the pool member show the application is functioning correctly.
ltm pool srv1_https_pool {
members {
192.168.2.1:https{
address 192.168.2.1
}}}
ltm virtual https_example_vs {
destination 192.168.1.155:https
ip-protocol tcp
mask 255.255.255.255
pool srv1_https_pool
profiles {
http { }
tcp { }
}
snat automap
vlans-disabled
}
How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an HTTP monitor. The pool member is accessible directly through a
browser, but the HTTP monitor is marking the pool member as down.
GET / HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
DatE. Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:39:07 GTM
Server: Apache/2.2.22 (FreeBSD) PHP/5.4.4
mod_ssl/2.2.22 OpenSSL/0.9.8q DAV/2
Content-LengtH. 226
Connection: close
Content-TypE. text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

What should the LTM Specialist do to solve the problem?

There are three servers in the pool: 172.16.20.1, 172.16.20.2, and 172.16.20.3, with the virtual IP address
10.0.20.88.
A user CANNOT connect to an HTTP application. To understand the problem and find a solution, the LTM
Specialist runs two concurrent traces on the LTM device, with the following results:
Trace on client side:
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on 0.0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
22:22:07.423759 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 10.0.20.88.80: S 998346084:998346084(0) win 5840 <mss
1460,sackOK,timestamp 67942058 0,nop,wscale 4>22:22:07.424056 IP 10.0.20.88.80 > 172.16.20.100.53875: S 4671780:4671780(0) ack 998346085 win
4380 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 2392362490 67942058,sackOK,eol>
22:22:07.424776 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 10.0.20.88.80: . ack 1 win 365 <nop,nop,timestamp 67942058
2392362490>
22:22:07.424790 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 10.0.20.88.80: P 1:149(148) ack 1 win 365
<nop,nop,timestamp 67942058 2392362490>
22:22:07.424891 IP 10.0.20.88.80 > 172.16.20.100.53875: . ack 149 win 4528 <nop,nop,timestamp
2392362491 67942058>
22:22:12.024850 IP 10.0.20.88.80 > 172.16.20.100.53875: R 1:1(0) ack 149 win 4528
6 packets captured
6 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
Trace on server side:
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on internal, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
22:22:07.424881 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 172.16.20.2.80: S 51116678:51116678(0) win 4380 <mss
1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 2392362491 0,sackOK,eol>
22:22:08.424893 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 172.16.20.2.80: S 51116678:51116678(0) win 4380 <mss
1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 2392363491 0,sackOK,eol>
22:22:09.625082 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 172.16.20.2.80: S 51116678:51116678(0) win 4380 <mss
1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 2392364691 0,sackOK,eol>
22:22:10.825194 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 172.16.20.2.80: S 51116678:51116678(0) win 4380 <mss
1460,sackOK,eol>
4 packets captured
4 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
What should the LTM Specialist do to solve the problem?


Page 26 of 49« First...1020...2425262728...40...Last »