PrepAway - Latest Free Exam Questions & Answers

Category: E20-322 (v.1)

Exam E20-322: Technology Architect Solutions Design (updated June 20th, 2013)

What is a limiting factor for this migration strategy?

ABC.com has purchased a new NS Celerra to replace an older NSG Celerra that is currently in
production.
You are designing the customer’s upgrade solution. The customer’s data on the current NSG has
mixed protocols:
CIFS and NFS. You would like to use Celerra Replicator V1 to migrate the data to the new
Celerra.
What is a limiting factor for this migration strategy?

how large will the total Reserved LUN Pool be, assuming only SnapView is used on only these LUNs?

A prospective customer has four applications (A, B, C, and D) with various LUNs they wish to
snapshot. The LUN sizes are as follows:
Application A:
10 GB
20 GB
10 GB
Application B:
25 GB

50 GB
Application C:
150 GB
5 GB
5 GB
Application D:
100 GB
25 GB
According to SnapView best practices, how large will the total Reserved LUN Pool be, assuming
only SnapView is used on only these LUNs?

How do you respond to the request?

A prospective customer has presented you with multiple applications. All applications have high
write activity levels and unpredictable growth patterns. The applications are currently hosted on
direct-attached storage in a RAID 1 configuration. They are concerned with making too many
changes at one time in their environment.
The prospect has asked you to justify your recommendation of RAID 1/0 on the CLARiiON
configuration you are proposing. How do you respond to the request?

Which CLARiiON feature will help the customer prevent this problem?

ABC.com would like to create a large pool of “scratch space” disk for their development
environment. They are considering using high-capacity SATA drives in a RAID 5 configuration on
their CLARiiON array. General performance is not an issue. However, the customer does not want
to experience long periods of degraded performance in the case of RAID rebuilds.
Which CLARiiON feature will help the customer prevent this problem?

Which additional information do you need before you can attempt a preliminary, high-level SAN design for this

ABC.com plans to roll out several experimental large-scale host clusters with low-cost blades for
computationally intensive workloads. All IS operations are in a single data center (50 m x 40 m).
They use direct-attached storage on all hosts. For better manageability of storage, they are
considering a SAN infrastructure with CLARiiON storage (CX3-40s). Preliminary design calls for
200 server blades. Cost and performance are both critical considerations, but high availability is
not. Your initial design has single-pathed FC connectivity to each host. Under sustained load, each
server blade can sustain up to 4,000 IOPS at 16 KB per I/O. Which additional information do you
need before you can attempt a preliminary, high-level SAN design for this environment?

How many disks are required for each configuration type?

Click the calculator icon in the upper left-hand corner.

A customer is deploying a Microsoft Exchange 2003 environment and has requested assistance
with the associated disk design. They are deploying Exchange for 850 users with an average of 3
I/Os per user. They expect a 60% read and 40% write distribution.
The customer would like to know the number of disks required for both RAID 5 and RAID 1/0 DMX
configurations with 10k rpm drives.
How many disks are required for each configuration type?

What is the likely reason for this performance issue?

During a proof of concept, ABC.com who is using a CLARiiON array with four Windows servers
notices I/O performance problems on a specific server. Looking at Navisphere Analyzer data for
the LUNs in question and comparing the statistics with the System Monitor (PerfMon) I/O counters
for the same Windows physical disks, the I/O statistics in Navisphere Analyzer are significantly
higher than the System Monitor shows. What is the likely reason for this performance issue?


Page 4 of 57« First...23456...102030...Last »