Which two configuration changes should be made on the OTP interface of an EIGRP OTP route reflector? (Choose two.)
A. passive-interface
B. no split-horizon
C. no next-hop-self
D. hello-interval 60, hold-time 180
2 Comments on “Which two configuration changes should be made on the OTP interface of an EIGRP OTP route reflector?”
Jordansays:
‘no split-horizon’ allows the OTP route-reflector to reflect EIGRP routes learned on that interface back out the same interface. ‘No next-hop-self’ prevents the OTP route reflector from setting his own IP as the next-hop address. This is a similar configuration to DMVPN Phase 2 with EIGRP.
0
0
Bensays:
OTP eigrp is implement eigrp over the wan, typically at CE routers.
1. why no split-horizon:
As OTP need to configure neighbour manually, the split-horizon is not applicable
2. why no next-hop-self
force the next hop to the remote router which eigrp learn from, not the local router
‘no split-horizon’ allows the OTP route-reflector to reflect EIGRP routes learned on that interface back out the same interface. ‘No next-hop-self’ prevents the OTP route reflector from setting his own IP as the next-hop address. This is a similar configuration to DMVPN Phase 2 with EIGRP.
0
0
OTP eigrp is implement eigrp over the wan, typically at CE routers.
1. why no split-horizon:
As OTP need to configure neighbour manually, the split-horizon is not applicable
2. why no next-hop-self
force the next hop to the remote router which eigrp learn from, not the local router
0
0