A network architect is planning a backplane stack with four HP 3800 switches. Which topology
provides the highest level of redundancy?
A.
Star
B.
Mesh
C.
Chain
D.
Ring
Explanation:
Reference:http://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA4-4874ENW.pdf
B
0
0
Right, mesh up to 5 or ring up to 10.
http://www8.hp.com/ca/en/products/networking-switches/product-detail.html?oid=5171624
0
0
?
0
0
HP recommends “Ring” in any case.
0
0
B
0
0
Mesh (B) is correct
0
0
the answer is D: Ring.
3800 Switches can allow Ring up to 10, and Mesh upto 5. Mesh is more resilient, but it is not permitted with IRF. So, for HP 3800, Ring is the correct answer.
Confirmed with Study Guide
0
0
The key is that they want to use 4 3800’s there for Mesh is the best answer. B
0
0
Not sure why it did as a reply to yours. Was meant to be generic reply.
0
0
Product Bulletin says:
Meshed stacking technology:
– High-performance stacking: provides up to 336 Gb/s of stacking throughput; each 4-port stacking module can support up to 42 Gb/s in each direction per stacking port
– Ring, chain, and mesh topologies: support up to a 10-member ring or chain and 5-member fully meshed stacks; meshed topologies offer increased resiliency vs. a standard ring
– Virtualized switching: provides simplified management as the switches appear as a single chassis when stacked
0
0
@AI
The Aruba 3800 Switch does not support IRF (It is a ProVision Switch). So for me, the answer is still “Mesh”.
0
0
Answer is Mesh.
in 14.21 study guide:
Topology:
– Ring (IRF)
– Ring (2920 Stack)
– Full Mesh (3800 Stack with up to 5 members)
0
0
Great.. thank you PS
0
0
Hi
What is th right answer B or D ?
help me please its urgent
thank you
0
0
Hi
What is the right answer B or D ?
0
0