A customer has the solution in the exhibit, which includes more access layer switches than are
shown. Members of the customer network team mention they are considering access layer routing
for a new solution to eliminate Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) and Virtual Router Redundancy
protocol (VRRP). However they are concerned about meaning the routing solution. The network
architect proposes a solution that eliminates STP and VRRP without requiring routing at the
access layer, although the solution can use access layer routing.
Which solution fits that description?

A.
Two HP 10500 Series, using intelligent Resilient Framework (IRF) at the core, HP S400 zl
Series switches at the access layer
B.
Two HP 10500 Series switches, using Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP), at the core. HP
2600 Series switch at the access layer
C.
Two HP 8200 zl Series switches, using distributed Trunking, at the core. HP 5400 zl Series
switches at the access layer
D.
Two HP zl Series switches, using backplane stacking, at the core. HP 5400 zl Series switches,
using the backbone stacking at the access layer
Is A, HSRP is Cisco
0
0
i would say A too, i have this actual test cheat sheet which says it is B, but HSRP is Cisco, so this wont be possible.
0
0
S400 ZL IT NOT A SWICT I say C
0
0
8200zl the i Say C•
Distributed trunking
Enables loop-free and redundant network topology without using STP; and allows a server or
switch to connect to two switches using one logical trunk for redundancy and load sharing
0
0
I believe it is A.
Since with C you still need to activate VRRP between 8200zl which Customer wants to avoid.
0
0
Answer:A
Two HP 10500 Series, using intelligent Resilient Framework (IRF) at the core, HP S400 zl Series switches at the access layer
==> S400 zl = 5400 zl 🙂 (because of the mistake or encryption)
0
0